{"title":"Formative Education: To Walter Asmus in Honor of his 85th Birthday.","authors":"E. Geißler","doi":"10.2753/EUE1056-4934210288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. In 1970, when I published a systematic interpretation of Herbart's pedagogical theory under the title \"Herbart's theory of 'formative education', \"[erziehender Unterricht] it was at a time when \"formative education\" was an accepted formula, in any event as a historicizing approach, and education in general was undergoing a highly critical assessment. If education was to have any validity at all, it could only be in the sense of Rousseau's negative conception, the famous \"d'empěcher que rien ne soit fait.\" Anti-authoritarian education was at the peak of its popularity and \"the tools of education\" were regarded fundamentally by many as the \"tools of manipulation,\" and that included many who otherwise had maintained a circumspect attitude toward the prevailing spirit of the time. Then, when toward the end of the same decade an \"educational deficiency\" in our schools became a topic of discussion, and a new \"courage to educate\" was put forth as a countervailing thrust, quite a few saw this as the emergence ...","PeriodicalId":104526,"journal":{"name":"Western European Education","volume":"443 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western European Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934210288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
1. In 1970, when I published a systematic interpretation of Herbart's pedagogical theory under the title "Herbart's theory of 'formative education', "[erziehender Unterricht] it was at a time when "formative education" was an accepted formula, in any event as a historicizing approach, and education in general was undergoing a highly critical assessment. If education was to have any validity at all, it could only be in the sense of Rousseau's negative conception, the famous "d'empěcher que rien ne soit fait." Anti-authoritarian education was at the peak of its popularity and "the tools of education" were regarded fundamentally by many as the "tools of manipulation," and that included many who otherwise had maintained a circumspect attitude toward the prevailing spirit of the time. Then, when toward the end of the same decade an "educational deficiency" in our schools became a topic of discussion, and a new "courage to educate" was put forth as a countervailing thrust, quite a few saw this as the emergence ...
1. 1970年,当我以“赫巴特的‘形成性教育’理论”为标题,对赫巴特的教学理论发表了一篇系统的解释时,“形成性教育”在任何情况下都是一个公认的公式,作为一种历史化的方法,而教育总体上正在经历一场高度批判性的评估。如果教育有任何有效性,它只能在卢梭的否定概念的意义上,即著名的“d' embercher que rien ne soit fait”。反专制教育正处于其受欢迎的顶峰,“教育工具”从根本上被许多人视为“操纵工具”,其中包括许多对当时盛行的精神保持谨慎态度的人。然后,在同一十年末,当我们学校的“教育不足”成为一个讨论的话题时,一种新的“教育的勇气”被提出作为一种对抗的推动力,相当多的人认为这是一种出现……