The effect of demonstration and mind mapping learning methods on achievement of cultural arts course

Jarmani Jarmani, Rusijiono Rusijiono, B. Bachri, Diah Yovita Suryarini
{"title":"The effect of demonstration and mind mapping learning methods on achievement of cultural arts course","authors":"Jarmani Jarmani, Rusijiono Rusijiono, B. Bachri, Diah Yovita Suryarini","doi":"10.29103/ijevs.v3i6.5308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study has looked at the variations in cultural learning outcomes for groups of students that utilize the methods and methods of thinking mapping, as well as the interaction between the two approaches in their role in learning arts. This study used experimental methods and a 2x2 factorial design to conduct quantitative research. All Junior High School second-grade pupils use the population. The analysis technique used is a two-way variant (two-way ANOVA). Student learning outcomes utilizing a demonstration technique are better than student learning outcomes using the mind monitoring method, according to the results of data processing. Students who use the demonstration approach perform better than those who use the mind mapping method. The average score for learning activeness with high demonstration methods and employing the approach of mapping student activeness thinking is poor.","PeriodicalId":332848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v3i6.5308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study has looked at the variations in cultural learning outcomes for groups of students that utilize the methods and methods of thinking mapping, as well as the interaction between the two approaches in their role in learning arts. This study used experimental methods and a 2x2 factorial design to conduct quantitative research. All Junior High School second-grade pupils use the population. The analysis technique used is a two-way variant (two-way ANOVA). Student learning outcomes utilizing a demonstration technique are better than student learning outcomes using the mind monitoring method, according to the results of data processing. Students who use the demonstration approach perform better than those who use the mind mapping method. The average score for learning activeness with high demonstration methods and employing the approach of mapping student activeness thinking is poor.
示范与思维导图学习方法对文化艺术课成绩的影响
本研究着眼于使用思维映射方法和方法的学生群体的文化学习结果的变化,以及两种方法在学习艺术中的作用之间的相互作用。本研究采用实验方法,采用2x2因子设计进行定量研究。所有初中二年级学生都使用人口。使用的分析技术是双向变量(双向方差分析)。根据数据处理的结果,使用演示技术的学生学习效果优于使用思维监控方法的学生学习效果。使用演示方法的学生比使用思维导图方法的学生表现得更好。采用高示范法和映射学生主动性思维的学习主动性平均得分较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信