Stealthy Wealth

Michelle D. Brophy-Baermann, Andrew J. Bloeser
{"title":"Stealthy Wealth","authors":"Michelle D. Brophy-Baermann, Andrew J. Bloeser","doi":"10.1177/1081180X06289561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A decade ago, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) ended welfare as we knew it. Since 1996, national media reports of the consequences of welfare reform have been decidedly positive. Yet a handful of journalists for metropolitan newspapers and the nonmainstream press have drawn attention to welfare-related scandals. These scandals have revolved around welfare privatization, an option PRWORA gave to the states. What could the public have known about privatization prior to reform? To answer this question, the authors investigate the elite debate over privatization and how the network news characterized this debate. They analyze the content of congressional testimony and news coverage by ABC, CBS, and NBC and conclude that the networks paid scant attention to privatization, and the coverage they did provide failed to accurately convey to viewers what postreform welfare administration might look like","PeriodicalId":145232,"journal":{"name":"The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X06289561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

A decade ago, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) ended welfare as we knew it. Since 1996, national media reports of the consequences of welfare reform have been decidedly positive. Yet a handful of journalists for metropolitan newspapers and the nonmainstream press have drawn attention to welfare-related scandals. These scandals have revolved around welfare privatization, an option PRWORA gave to the states. What could the public have known about privatization prior to reform? To answer this question, the authors investigate the elite debate over privatization and how the network news characterized this debate. They analyze the content of congressional testimony and news coverage by ABC, CBS, and NBC and conclude that the networks paid scant attention to privatization, and the coverage they did provide failed to accurately convey to viewers what postreform welfare administration might look like
隐形的财富
十年前,《个人责任与工作机会和解法案》(PRWORA)终结了我们所熟知的福利制度。自1996年以来,全国媒体对福利改革结果的报道一直是积极的。然而,一些大都市报纸和非主流媒体的记者已经引起了人们对福利相关丑闻的关注。这些丑闻都围绕着福利私有化展开,这是PRWORA给各州的一个选择。在改革之前,公众对私有化了解多少?为了回答这个问题,作者调查了关于私有化的精英辩论,以及网络新闻如何描述了这场辩论。他们分析了美国广播公司、哥伦比亚广播公司和全国广播公司的国会证词和新闻报道的内容,得出结论认为,这些网络对私有化关注不足,他们提供的报道也未能准确地向观众传达改革后的福利行政可能是什么样子
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信