Validation of an Instrument to Assess Beliefs About Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry in Namibia

S. N. Shaakumeni
{"title":"Validation of an Instrument to Assess Beliefs About Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry in Namibia","authors":"S. N. Shaakumeni","doi":"10.19044/EJES.V6NO2A2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to validate a new 5-point Likert scale questionnaire that is being developed to assess secondary school science students’ beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry. Following a review of literature, it was found that out of the many existing instruments, most of them were open-ended and none were found to have been developed in the cultural context of Namibia. The beliefs about nature of science (BANOS) questionnaire is currently being developed to break the ground for future cross-sectional research on the nature of science and scientific inquiry in Namibia. The BANOS questionnaire taps from aspects of nature of science and scientific inquiry as a theoretical framework. The 35-item BANOS questionnaire was administered to a sample of 124 (39% male and 61% female) secondary school science teachers. The analysis of the instrument showed that the average inter-item correlation was reasonable at r = .40, the mean item-total correlations were acceptable at r = .63 and the reliability was very high at  = .96. Science teachers response pattern showed several variations indicating mixed beliefs about the nature of science and scientific inquiry. At non-parametric level, it was established that gender, science teaching and the type of science subject taught did not influence teachers’ beliefs about nature of science and scientific inquiry. Further piloting of the questionnaire on adequate sample of student population is needed to enable more robust statistical analyses to assess the psychometric properties of the instrument.","PeriodicalId":245027,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19044/EJES.V6NO2A2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate a new 5-point Likert scale questionnaire that is being developed to assess secondary school science students’ beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry. Following a review of literature, it was found that out of the many existing instruments, most of them were open-ended and none were found to have been developed in the cultural context of Namibia. The beliefs about nature of science (BANOS) questionnaire is currently being developed to break the ground for future cross-sectional research on the nature of science and scientific inquiry in Namibia. The BANOS questionnaire taps from aspects of nature of science and scientific inquiry as a theoretical framework. The 35-item BANOS questionnaire was administered to a sample of 124 (39% male and 61% female) secondary school science teachers. The analysis of the instrument showed that the average inter-item correlation was reasonable at r = .40, the mean item-total correlations were acceptable at r = .63 and the reliability was very high at  = .96. Science teachers response pattern showed several variations indicating mixed beliefs about the nature of science and scientific inquiry. At non-parametric level, it was established that gender, science teaching and the type of science subject taught did not influence teachers’ beliefs about nature of science and scientific inquiry. Further piloting of the questionnaire on adequate sample of student population is needed to enable more robust statistical analyses to assess the psychometric properties of the instrument.
评估纳米比亚科学本质和科学探究信念的工具的验证
本研究的目的是验证一种新的5分李克特量表问卷,该问卷正在开发中,用于评估中学理科生对科学知识和科学探究的本质的信念。在对文献进行审查后发现,在现有的许多文书中,大多数文书都是开放式的,没有一项文书是根据纳米比亚的文化背景拟订的。目前正在编制关于科学本质的信念(BANOS)问卷,以便为纳米比亚未来关于科学本质和科学探究的横断面研究奠定基础。BANOS问卷以科学的本质和科学探究为理论框架。采用35项BANOS问卷对124名中学科学教师(男性39%,女性61%)进行调查。对仪器的分析表明,项目间的平均相关系数在r = 0.40时是合理的,项目与总相关系数在r = 0.63时是可以接受的,信度在= 0.96时非常高。科学教师的反应模式显示出一些变化,表明对科学本质和科学探究的混合信念。在非参数水平上,性别、科学教学和所教授的科学学科类型不影响教师对科学本质和科学探究的信念。需要在足够的学生群体样本上对问卷进行进一步试点,以便进行更有力的统计分析,以评估该工具的心理测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信