Indicators of body asymmetry in relation to the prevention of scoliosis in first graders

I. Zanevskyy, O. Bodnarchuk, L. Zanevska
{"title":"Indicators of body asymmetry in relation to the prevention of scoliosis in first graders","authors":"I. Zanevskyy, O. Bodnarchuk, L. Zanevska","doi":"10.15391/prrht.2022-7(4).29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: the purpose of the study was to increase the validity of the indicator of asymmetry in the frontal plane of the body in relation to the prevention of scoliosis in first graders.\n\nMaterial & Methods: thirty-four students aged six to seven years – 18 boys (with body length and weight M±SD=118,9±2.1 cm; 21,6±1,1 kg) and 16 girls (118,2±1,8 cm, 21,2±0,9 kg) were randomly divided into the main group and the comparison group. In addition to standard physical education lessons, students of the main group completed a program of physical rehabilitation in order to prevent the development of posture asymmetry. At the beginning (September) and the end of the academic year (May), the students were measuring the curvature of the spine in the frontal plane according to the Moshkov test and bending to the sides.\n\nResults: in addition to the well-known model of the Moshkov rhombus, the asymmetry of the students’ bodies was determined using an improved indicator equal to half the sum of the absolute values of the differences in the lengths of the upper and lower sides of the Moshkov rhombus. There was no statistically significant difference between the boys, both according to the results of the Moshkov test (δ=0,3%; p=0,512), and according to the results of bending to the sides (δ=1,4%; р=0,379). At the beginning of the academic year, the value of the asymmetry indicator in the main group was practically equal to the corresponding value in the comparison group (δ=2,2%; р=0,815). At the end of the academic year, the value of the indicator in the main group was significantly less than its value in the comparison group. (δ=32,8%; р=0,031).\n\nConclusions: the indicator of asymmetry in the frontal plane of the body proposed in this work, due to taking into account the magnitude of the curvature of both the upper and lower parts of the spine, made it possible to obtain a significantly higher validity (p=0,02) compared to the well-known indicator of the Moshkov rhombus, which in one parts of the spine – upper or lower (р=0,05).","PeriodicalId":347675,"journal":{"name":"Physical rehabilitation and recreational health technologies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical rehabilitation and recreational health technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15391/prrht.2022-7(4).29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: the purpose of the study was to increase the validity of the indicator of asymmetry in the frontal plane of the body in relation to the prevention of scoliosis in first graders. Material & Methods: thirty-four students aged six to seven years – 18 boys (with body length and weight M±SD=118,9±2.1 cm; 21,6±1,1 kg) and 16 girls (118,2±1,8 cm, 21,2±0,9 kg) were randomly divided into the main group and the comparison group. In addition to standard physical education lessons, students of the main group completed a program of physical rehabilitation in order to prevent the development of posture asymmetry. At the beginning (September) and the end of the academic year (May), the students were measuring the curvature of the spine in the frontal plane according to the Moshkov test and bending to the sides. Results: in addition to the well-known model of the Moshkov rhombus, the asymmetry of the students’ bodies was determined using an improved indicator equal to half the sum of the absolute values of the differences in the lengths of the upper and lower sides of the Moshkov rhombus. There was no statistically significant difference between the boys, both according to the results of the Moshkov test (δ=0,3%; p=0,512), and according to the results of bending to the sides (δ=1,4%; р=0,379). At the beginning of the academic year, the value of the asymmetry indicator in the main group was practically equal to the corresponding value in the comparison group (δ=2,2%; р=0,815). At the end of the academic year, the value of the indicator in the main group was significantly less than its value in the comparison group. (δ=32,8%; р=0,031). Conclusions: the indicator of asymmetry in the frontal plane of the body proposed in this work, due to taking into account the magnitude of the curvature of both the upper and lower parts of the spine, made it possible to obtain a significantly higher validity (p=0,02) compared to the well-known indicator of the Moshkov rhombus, which in one parts of the spine – upper or lower (р=0,05).
一年级学生身体不对称指标与脊柱侧凸预防的关系
目的:本研究的目的是提高身体额平面不对称指标在预防一年级学生脊柱侧凸中的效度。材料与方法:6 ~ 7岁学生34名,男生18名(体长、体重M±SD=118,9±2.1 cm;21日6±1,1公斤)和16个女孩(118 2±1 8厘米,21日2±0,9公斤)被随机分为主要组和对照组。除了标准的体育课程,学生的主要组完成一个程序的物理康复为了防止姿势不对称的发展。在学年的开始(9月)和结束(5月),学生们根据莫什科夫测试测量脊柱在正面的弯曲度,并向两侧弯曲。结果:除了著名的莫什科夫菱形模型外,学生身体的不对称性是用一种改进的指标来确定的,该指标等于莫什科夫菱形上下两侧长度差异绝对值之和的一半。根据Moshkov检验结果,男孩之间无统计学差异(δ= 0.3%;P =0,512),并且根据向侧面弯曲的结果(δ=1,4%;р= 0379)。在学年开始时,主组的不对称指标值几乎等于对照组的相应值(δ=2,2%;р= 0815)。在学年结束时,主组的指标值明显低于对照组的指标值。(δ= 32,8%;р= 0031)。结论:在这项工作中提出的身体正面不对称的指标,由于考虑到脊柱上下部分的曲率大小,与众所周知的莫什科夫菱形指标相比,有可能获得显着更高的效度(p= 0.02),后者在脊柱的一个部分-上或下(p= 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信