Comparison of Effect of Conventional Medical Management and Ivabradine with Conventional Medical Management on Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

R. Ghosh, Rajeshwari Ghose, Md Rezaul Karim, Shahin Ara, Md Azizul Haque, Md. Nazmul Haque, Mita Rani Joysoual
{"title":"Comparison of Effect of Conventional Medical Management and Ivabradine with Conventional Medical Management on Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure","authors":"R. Ghosh, Rajeshwari Ghose, Md Rezaul Karim, Shahin Ara, Md Azizul Haque, Md. Nazmul Haque, Mita Rani Joysoual","doi":"10.3329/taj.v36i1.68273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The study aimed to see the effectiveness and role of ivabradine on the quality of life in chronic heart failure suffering patients. This open-label Randomized controlled Trial was conducted to assess the effect of ivabradine plus conventional medical management over conventional medical management on quality-of-life parameters among 100 patients of chronic heart failure from January 2021 to December 2021 in the Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics in collaboration with the Department of Cardiology & Medicine, Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi. \nMaterials and methods: According to the drug allocation study population was divided into a control group (50 patients) and an experimental group (50 patients). Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLWHFQ) was used to assess the quality of life, and the resting heart rate was measured by 12-lead electrocardiography. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, and patients were followed up at four weeks and 12 weeks of treatment. \nResults: The comparison of mean differences of MLWHFQ score at first and second follow-up visits between the two study groups was statistically significant [t (100) = 2.43 p < 0.05 & t (100) = 6.60 p < 0.001 respectively]. According to the MLWHFQ cut-point score, it was also observed that poor baseline quality of life gradually shifted to good quality after four weeks and 12 weeks of treatment, and it was proportionately higher in the experimental group. Relations between the respondents of both study groups and their different qualities of life during the first follow-up visit (x2 = 13.69, df = 2, p < 0.05) and second follow-up visit (x2 = 22.79, df = 2, p < 0.001) were statistically significant.The comparison of the mean (±SD) heart rate between the two study groups was statistically significant (p <0.001) only during the second follow-up visit. \nConclusion: This study concluded that adding ivabradine to conventional medical management in treating patients with chronic heart failure improves their symptoms, quality of life, and heart rate and ultimately reduces the morbidity and mortality of such patients. \nTAJ 2022; 36: No-1: 1-8","PeriodicalId":373921,"journal":{"name":"TAJ: Journal of Teachers Association","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TAJ: Journal of Teachers Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/taj.v36i1.68273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to see the effectiveness and role of ivabradine on the quality of life in chronic heart failure suffering patients. This open-label Randomized controlled Trial was conducted to assess the effect of ivabradine plus conventional medical management over conventional medical management on quality-of-life parameters among 100 patients of chronic heart failure from January 2021 to December 2021 in the Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics in collaboration with the Department of Cardiology & Medicine, Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Rajshahi. Materials and methods: According to the drug allocation study population was divided into a control group (50 patients) and an experimental group (50 patients). Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLWHFQ) was used to assess the quality of life, and the resting heart rate was measured by 12-lead electrocardiography. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, and patients were followed up at four weeks and 12 weeks of treatment. Results: The comparison of mean differences of MLWHFQ score at first and second follow-up visits between the two study groups was statistically significant [t (100) = 2.43 p < 0.05 & t (100) = 6.60 p < 0.001 respectively]. According to the MLWHFQ cut-point score, it was also observed that poor baseline quality of life gradually shifted to good quality after four weeks and 12 weeks of treatment, and it was proportionately higher in the experimental group. Relations between the respondents of both study groups and their different qualities of life during the first follow-up visit (x2 = 13.69, df = 2, p < 0.05) and second follow-up visit (x2 = 22.79, df = 2, p < 0.001) were statistically significant.The comparison of the mean (±SD) heart rate between the two study groups was statistically significant (p <0.001) only during the second follow-up visit. Conclusion: This study concluded that adding ivabradine to conventional medical management in treating patients with chronic heart failure improves their symptoms, quality of life, and heart rate and ultimately reduces the morbidity and mortality of such patients. TAJ 2022; 36: No-1: 1-8
常规医疗管理与伊伐布雷定与常规医疗管理对慢性心力衰竭患者生活质量的影响比较
背景:本研究旨在观察伊伐布雷定对慢性心力衰竭患者生活质量的影响及作用。本开放标签随机对照试验旨在评估伊伐布雷定加常规医疗管理对2021年1月至2021年12月期间在拉杰沙希医学院附属拉杰沙希医学院药理学与治疗学系合作的100例慢性心力衰竭患者生活质量参数的影响。材料与方法:根据药物分配将研究人群分为对照组(50例)和实验组(50例)。采用明尼苏达心力衰竭患者生活问卷(MLWHFQ)评估患者的生活质量,静息心率采用12导联心电图测量。记录基线人口统计学和临床特征,并在治疗4周和12周时对患者进行随访。结果:两组患者第一次和第二次随访时MLWHFQ评分的平均差异比较,差异均有统计学意义[t (100) = 2.43 p < 0.05 & t (100) = 6.60 p < 0.001]。根据MLWHFQ切割点评分,也观察到在治疗4周和12周后,较差的基线生活质量逐渐向较好的基线生活质量转变,实验组的基线生活质量比例较高。两组被调查者在第一次随访(x2 = 13.69, df = 2, p < 0.05)和第二次随访(x2 = 22.79, df = 2, p < 0.001)时的生活质量与生活质量的关系均有统计学意义。两个研究组的平均(±SD)心率只有在第二次随访时才有统计学意义(p <0.001)。结论:在常规医疗管理中加入伊伐布雷定可改善慢性心力衰竭患者的症状、生活质量和心率,最终降低慢性心力衰竭患者的发病率和死亡率。泰姬酒店2022;36: No-1: 1-8
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信