An assessment of the applicability of object-oriented analysis to the development of information systems

Isabel Santos, J. Carvalho
{"title":"An assessment of the applicability of object-oriented analysis to the development of information systems","authors":"Isabel Santos, J. Carvalho","doi":"10.1109/ICRE.1996.491452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, several object-oriented (OO) approaches to the analysis of information systems (IS) have been proposed by different authors. However, there is still some controversy about the adequacy of OO approaches to IS modelling. While some authors claim that OO modelling techniques are very close to the way human beings organise their ideas, other authors point out some difficulties in the exclusive use of OO models for IS modelling. The experiment described in the paper constitutes a contribution to the understanding of the adequacy of OO approaches to IS modelling. The deliverables of an IS analysis project (carried out according to the Coad/Yourdon OO analysis method) have been presented to three opinion groups: undergraduate IS students, post-graduate IS students, and domain experts (insurance business). The results of the experiment suggest that the approach used in the project can lead to \"good\" IS models (e.g. dimension, level of detail, consistency, understandability) although there are some aspects that need to be improved. One particular aspect where OO IS models seem to fail is the adequate representation of organisation processes.","PeriodicalId":152956,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Requirements Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.1996.491452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In recent years, several object-oriented (OO) approaches to the analysis of information systems (IS) have been proposed by different authors. However, there is still some controversy about the adequacy of OO approaches to IS modelling. While some authors claim that OO modelling techniques are very close to the way human beings organise their ideas, other authors point out some difficulties in the exclusive use of OO models for IS modelling. The experiment described in the paper constitutes a contribution to the understanding of the adequacy of OO approaches to IS modelling. The deliverables of an IS analysis project (carried out according to the Coad/Yourdon OO analysis method) have been presented to three opinion groups: undergraduate IS students, post-graduate IS students, and domain experts (insurance business). The results of the experiment suggest that the approach used in the project can lead to "good" IS models (e.g. dimension, level of detail, consistency, understandability) although there are some aspects that need to be improved. One particular aspect where OO IS models seem to fail is the adequate representation of organisation processes.
评估面向对象分析对信息系统开发的适用性
近年来,不同的作者提出了几种面向对象(OO)的信息系统分析方法。然而,对于面向对象方法在is建模中的充分性仍然存在一些争议。虽然一些作者声称OO建模技术非常接近人类组织思想的方式,但其他作者指出了将OO模型专门用于IS建模的一些困难。本文中描述的实验有助于理解面向对象方法对IS建模的充分性。一个信息系统分析项目的可交付成果(根据Coad/Yourdon OO分析方法执行)已经呈现给三个意见群体:本科信息系统学生、研究生信息系统学生和领域专家(保险业务)。实验结果表明,项目中使用的方法可以产生“好的”IS模型(例如,维度、细节水平、一致性、可理解性),尽管有一些方面需要改进。OO IS模型失败的一个特殊方面是组织过程的充分表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信