Have 401(K)S Raised Household Saving? Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study

Labor eJournal Pub Date : 2000-09-29 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.285174
Gary V. Engelhardt
{"title":"Have 401(K)S Raised Household Saving? Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study","authors":"Gary V. Engelhardt","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.285174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"401(k)-type pension arrangements are the most popular tax subsidy to household saving in the U.S. This study uses self- and firm-reported pension information, Social Security, and household wealth data from 1992 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to examine the extent to which 401(k) pension plans have raised household saving. Comparison of self- and firm-reported pension information indicates significant measurement error in self-reported 401(k) eligibility. This error has biased the estimated 401(k) saving effects in all previous studies upward significantly and differentially by income category. There is evidence of significant measurement error in pension assets as well. Overall, the estimates that account for both types of measurement error suggest that 401(k)s have not raised household saving. All of the estimates are significantly lower than those implied by previous studies that have found large effects. The most plausible explanation for the large estimated offset to household saving is firm-level substitution of 401(k)s for other pensions. Even though very little of the average dollar of 401(k) wealth appears to be new household saving, 401(k)s may have stimulated saving significantly for lower-to-middle income households and, hence, increased retirement income security for an important segment of the population.","PeriodicalId":114523,"journal":{"name":"Labor eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.285174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

401(k)-type pension arrangements are the most popular tax subsidy to household saving in the U.S. This study uses self- and firm-reported pension information, Social Security, and household wealth data from 1992 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to examine the extent to which 401(k) pension plans have raised household saving. Comparison of self- and firm-reported pension information indicates significant measurement error in self-reported 401(k) eligibility. This error has biased the estimated 401(k) saving effects in all previous studies upward significantly and differentially by income category. There is evidence of significant measurement error in pension assets as well. Overall, the estimates that account for both types of measurement error suggest that 401(k)s have not raised household saving. All of the estimates are significantly lower than those implied by previous studies that have found large effects. The most plausible explanation for the large estimated offset to household saving is firm-level substitution of 401(k)s for other pensions. Even though very little of the average dollar of 401(k) wealth appears to be new household saving, 401(k)s may have stimulated saving significantly for lower-to-middle income households and, hence, increased retirement income security for an important segment of the population.
401(K)S提高了家庭储蓄吗?来自健康和退休研究的证据
401(k)型养老金安排是美国最受欢迎的家庭储蓄税收补贴。本研究使用1992年健康与退休研究(HRS)的个人和公司报告的养老金信息、社会保障和家庭财富数据来检验401(k)养老金计划提高家庭储蓄的程度。自我报告和公司报告养老金信息的比较表明,自我报告的401(k)资格存在显著的测量误差。这一错误使之前所有研究中估计的401(k)储蓄效果显著上升,而且不同收入类别的差异很大。有证据表明,养老金资产计量存在显著误差。总的来说,考虑到这两种测量误差的估计表明,401(k)计划并没有提高家庭储蓄。所有这些估计值都明显低于之前发现了巨大影响的研究所暗示的估计值。最合理的解释是,对家庭储蓄的巨大估计抵消是公司层面的401(k)替代其他养老金。尽管401(k)计划的平均财富中只有很少一部分是新的家庭储蓄,但它可能极大地刺激了中低收入家庭的储蓄,从而增加了一部分人口的退休收入保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信