Agricultural Investment and Food Security

Jayden Oditi
{"title":"Agricultural Investment and Food Security","authors":"Jayden Oditi","doi":"10.47604/jpid.2088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate Agricultural Investment and Food Security. \nMethodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. \nFindings: The study revealed a complex relationship characterized by mixed outcomes. While some agricultural investments contribute positively to food security by enhancing productivity, improving infrastructure, and generating income opportunities, others can lead to land grabbing, displacement of local communities, and resource degradation, exacerbating food insecurity. The effectiveness of investments in enhancing food security hinges on factors such as the type of investment, local contexts, and policy frameworks, emphasizing the need for carefully designed and context-specific investment strategies to ensure sustainable and equitable food security outcomes. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Theory of Agricultural Transformation, Structural Transformation and Sustainable Agriculture Theory may be used to anchor future studies on Agricultural investment and food security. Encouraged farmers to diversify their crop production to reduce risks associated with mono-cropping. Enforce regulations that promote sustainable farming practices and environmental conservation to ensure the long-term viability of agricultural production.","PeriodicalId":194383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development","volume":"960 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47604/jpid.2088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate Agricultural Investment and Food Security. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study revealed a complex relationship characterized by mixed outcomes. While some agricultural investments contribute positively to food security by enhancing productivity, improving infrastructure, and generating income opportunities, others can lead to land grabbing, displacement of local communities, and resource degradation, exacerbating food insecurity. The effectiveness of investments in enhancing food security hinges on factors such as the type of investment, local contexts, and policy frameworks, emphasizing the need for carefully designed and context-specific investment strategies to ensure sustainable and equitable food security outcomes. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Theory of Agricultural Transformation, Structural Transformation and Sustainable Agriculture Theory may be used to anchor future studies on Agricultural investment and food security. Encouraged farmers to diversify their crop production to reduce risks associated with mono-cropping. Enforce regulations that promote sustainable farming practices and environmental conservation to ensure the long-term viability of agricultural production.
农业投资和粮食安全
目的:探讨农业投资与粮食安全的关系。研究方法:本研究采用桌面法。书桌式研究设计通常被称为二次资料收集。这基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因为与实地研究相比,它的成本较低。我们目前的研究调查了已经发表的研究和报告,因为数据很容易通过在线期刊和图书馆获取。研究结果:该研究揭示了一种复杂的关系,其特点是结果不一。虽然一些农业投资通过提高生产力、改善基础设施和创造收入机会对粮食安全做出了积极贡献,但其他农业投资可能导致土地掠夺、当地社区流离失所和资源退化,从而加剧粮食不安全。投资对加强粮食安全的有效性取决于投资类型、当地情况和政策框架等因素,强调需要精心设计和针对具体情况的投资战略,以确保可持续和公平的粮食安全成果。在理论、实践和政策方面的独特贡献:农业转型理论、结构转型理论和可持续农业理论可用于未来农业投资与粮食安全的研究。鼓励农民多样化作物生产,以减少单作带来的风险。执行促进可持续耕作做法和环境保护的法规,以确保农业生产的长期可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信