{"title":"Recent legal aspects of medical negligence","authors":"R. Bala, A. Chanana","doi":"10.18099/IJETV.V2I1.11134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In spite of following one of the best management strategies, by the competent doctors with best available infrastructures in patient care, undesired results harming the patient cannot be avoided. Does it mean all these undesired results causing damage to the patient are as a result of medical negligence? Nowadays, patients are more aware of their rights on account of increased literacy level, role of print, electronic and social media and above all enactment of new law i.e. Consumer Protection Act 1986.Though the question of medical negligence is decided by Courts, but Courts on their own are not trained in medical science. Their decision is based on expert’s opinion. Judges apply the basic principle of law in conjunction with the law of land to make a decision. Reasonableness and prudence are the guiding factors. This paper deals with the legal aspects of medical negligence i.e. what is negligence and its type and various judgements especially the Jacob Mathew vs. State of Punjab 2005 and Anr, Martin F.D’Souza vs. Mohd. Ishfaq 2009, V. Kishan Rao vs. Nikhil Super Specialty Hospital 2010 delivered by the Apex Court to make the law of negligence more rational and directions given to subordinate Courts, various Consumer Fora, State and investigating agencies regarding procedures to be followed before filing a complaint or registering a case of criminal negligence against the doctor.","PeriodicalId":346392,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Ethics","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18099/IJETV.V2I1.11134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In spite of following one of the best management strategies, by the competent doctors with best available infrastructures in patient care, undesired results harming the patient cannot be avoided. Does it mean all these undesired results causing damage to the patient are as a result of medical negligence? Nowadays, patients are more aware of their rights on account of increased literacy level, role of print, electronic and social media and above all enactment of new law i.e. Consumer Protection Act 1986.Though the question of medical negligence is decided by Courts, but Courts on their own are not trained in medical science. Their decision is based on expert’s opinion. Judges apply the basic principle of law in conjunction with the law of land to make a decision. Reasonableness and prudence are the guiding factors. This paper deals with the legal aspects of medical negligence i.e. what is negligence and its type and various judgements especially the Jacob Mathew vs. State of Punjab 2005 and Anr, Martin F.D’Souza vs. Mohd. Ishfaq 2009, V. Kishan Rao vs. Nikhil Super Specialty Hospital 2010 delivered by the Apex Court to make the law of negligence more rational and directions given to subordinate Courts, various Consumer Fora, State and investigating agencies regarding procedures to be followed before filing a complaint or registering a case of criminal negligence against the doctor.
尽管遵循最好的管理策略之一,由有能力的医生提供最好的基础设施在病人护理中,不希望的结果伤害病人是不可避免的。这是否意味着所有这些对病人造成损害的不希望的结果都是医疗疏忽的结果?如今,由于文化水平的提高,印刷、电子和社交媒体的作用,以及最重要的是新法律的颁布,即《1986年消费者保护法》,患者更加意识到自己的权利。尽管医疗过失问题由法院裁决,但法院本身并没有接受过医学方面的培训。他们的决定是以专家的意见为基础的。法官结合土地法运用法律的基本原则作出判决。合理和审慎是指导因素。本文涉及医疗过失的法律方面,即什么是疏忽及其类型和各种判决,特别是Jacob Mathew诉旁遮普邦2005和Anr, Martin F.D 'Souza诉Mohd。由最高法院提交的《2009年Ishfaq, V. Kishan Rao诉Nikhil超级专科医院》,旨在使过失法更加合理,并向下级法院、各种消费者论坛、国家和调查机构发出指示,说明在对医生提起诉讼或登记刑事过失案件之前应遵循的程序。