Precision medicine for colorectal cancer

C. Hızel, S. Tüzmen, A. Amirfallah, G. C. Kocal, Duygu Abbasoğlu, H. Onat, Y. Yıldırım, Y. Baskın
{"title":"Precision medicine for colorectal cancer","authors":"C. Hızel, S. Tüzmen, A. Amirfallah, G. C. Kocal, Duygu Abbasoğlu, H. Onat, Y. Yıldırım, Y. Baskın","doi":"10.1201/9781315154749-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Europe. Because CRC is also a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, a lot of research has been dedicated to the discovery and development of biomarkers to improve the diagnostic process and to predict treatment outcomes. Up till now only a few biomarkers are recommend by expert panels. The currently used TNM criteria, however, cause substantial under- and overtreatment of CRC patients. Consequently, there is a growing need for new and e ffi cient biomarkers to ensure optimal treatment allocation. The ideal biomarker is one that can easily be introduced in clinical practice, able to identify patients who can be spared from treatment or capable of identifying patients who will bene fi t from therapy, ultimately resulting in precision medicine in the future. With this review we aimed to provide an overview of a number of frequently studied biomarkers in CRC and at the same time we will emphasize the di ffi culties and controversies that with-hold the clinical introduction of these biomarkers. We will discuss both prognostic and predictive markers of chemotherapy, aspirin therapy as well as overall therapy toxicity. Currently, only mutant KRAS, mutant BRAF, MSI and the Onco type DX Colon Cancer Assay are used in clinical practice. Other biomarker studies showed insu ffi cient evidence to introduce these biomarkers in clinical practice. Divergent patient selection criteria, absence of validation studies, and a large number of single biomarker studies are possibly responsible. We therefore advice future studies to focus on combining key markers rather than analyzing only one marker, standardizing study protocols and to validate the results in independent study cohorts followed by prospective clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":350592,"journal":{"name":"Precision Medicine in Cancers and Non-Communicable Diseases","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Medicine in Cancers and Non-Communicable Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315154749-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Europe. Because CRC is also a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, a lot of research has been dedicated to the discovery and development of biomarkers to improve the diagnostic process and to predict treatment outcomes. Up till now only a few biomarkers are recommend by expert panels. The currently used TNM criteria, however, cause substantial under- and overtreatment of CRC patients. Consequently, there is a growing need for new and e ffi cient biomarkers to ensure optimal treatment allocation. The ideal biomarker is one that can easily be introduced in clinical practice, able to identify patients who can be spared from treatment or capable of identifying patients who will bene fi t from therapy, ultimately resulting in precision medicine in the future. With this review we aimed to provide an overview of a number of frequently studied biomarkers in CRC and at the same time we will emphasize the di ffi culties and controversies that with-hold the clinical introduction of these biomarkers. We will discuss both prognostic and predictive markers of chemotherapy, aspirin therapy as well as overall therapy toxicity. Currently, only mutant KRAS, mutant BRAF, MSI and the Onco type DX Colon Cancer Assay are used in clinical practice. Other biomarker studies showed insu ffi cient evidence to introduce these biomarkers in clinical practice. Divergent patient selection criteria, absence of validation studies, and a large number of single biomarker studies are possibly responsible. We therefore advice future studies to focus on combining key markers rather than analyzing only one marker, standardizing study protocols and to validate the results in independent study cohorts followed by prospective clinical trials.
结直肠癌精准医疗
结直肠癌(CRC)是欧洲最常见的癌症。由于结直肠癌也是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因,因此大量研究致力于发现和开发生物标志物,以改善诊断过程并预测治疗结果。到目前为止,只有少数生物标志物是由专家小组推荐的。然而,目前使用的TNM标准导致大量CRC患者治疗不足和过度。因此,越来越需要新的和有效的生物标志物来确保最佳的治疗分配。理想的生物标志物是一种可以很容易地引入临床实践的生物标志物,能够识别哪些患者可以免于治疗,或者能够识别哪些患者将从治疗中受益,最终在未来实现精准医疗。在这篇综述中,我们旨在概述一些经常研究的结直肠癌生物标志物,同时我们将强调阻碍这些生物标志物临床应用的困难和争议。我们将讨论化疗、阿司匹林治疗以及总体治疗毒性的预后和预测指标。目前,只有突变型KRAS、突变型BRAF、MSI和Onco型DX结肠癌检测被用于临床实践。其他生物标志物研究显示,将这些生物标志物引入临床实践的证据不足。不同的患者选择标准,验证研究的缺乏,以及大量的单一生物标志物研究可能是负责任的。因此,我们建议未来的研究将重点放在结合关键标志物上,而不是只分析一个标志物,标准化研究方案,并在独立研究队列中验证结果,然后进行前瞻性临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信