Korea's Strategies for ICT Standards Internationalisation: A Comparison with China's

Heejin Lee, Joon Huh
{"title":"Korea's Strategies for ICT Standards Internationalisation: A Comparison with China's","authors":"Heejin Lee, Joon Huh","doi":"10.4018/jitsr.2012070101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Korea and China are among the rising challengers in the international ICT Information Communication and Technology standards regime. They are attempting to internationalize their home-grown technologies. As latecomers they share similarities and display differences. This paper examines two Korean cases WIPI and WiBro, and compares with Chinese cases. Thereby it helps to conceptualize and evaluate latecomers' strategies for international standardization. Comparison of the two countries' strategies for international standardization is useful and timely particularly considering forthcoming FTA negotiations between the two countries where TBT technical barriers to trade including standards becomes a critical part of the agreement. The cases of the two countries share some commonalities in terms of origination local R&D, government leadership and motivation reduction of royalties. The main difference is that while Korea is oriented towards the outside, China is towards the inside, at least by now. Due to its huge domestic markets and global influence, China's standards form a real threat to the incumbent standards from traditional players like US and EU.","PeriodicalId":169063,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res.","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jitsr.2012070101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Korea and China are among the rising challengers in the international ICT Information Communication and Technology standards regime. They are attempting to internationalize their home-grown technologies. As latecomers they share similarities and display differences. This paper examines two Korean cases WIPI and WiBro, and compares with Chinese cases. Thereby it helps to conceptualize and evaluate latecomers' strategies for international standardization. Comparison of the two countries' strategies for international standardization is useful and timely particularly considering forthcoming FTA negotiations between the two countries where TBT technical barriers to trade including standards becomes a critical part of the agreement. The cases of the two countries share some commonalities in terms of origination local R&D, government leadership and motivation reduction of royalties. The main difference is that while Korea is oriented towards the outside, China is towards the inside, at least by now. Due to its huge domestic markets and global influence, China's standards form a real threat to the incumbent standards from traditional players like US and EU.
韩国ICT标准国际化战略:与中国的比较
韩国和中国是国际信息通信技术(ICT)标准体系的挑战者。他们正试图使自己的本土技术国际化。作为后来者,他们有相似之处,也有不同之处。本文考察了韩国的WIPI和WiBro两个案例,并与中国的案例进行了比较。因此,它有助于概念化和评价后发国家的国际标准化战略。比较两国的国际标准化战略是有益和及时的,特别是考虑到两国即将进行的自由贸易协定谈判,其中包括标准在内的技术性贸易壁垒成为协议的关键部分。两国的案例在原产地、本地研发、政府领导和降低特许权使用费动机等方面具有一定的共性。主要的区别在于,韩国是面向外部的,而中国是面向内部的,至少到目前为止是这样。由于其巨大的国内市场和全球影响力,中国标准对美国和欧盟等传统参与者的现有标准构成了真正的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信