Comparison of approaches and functions for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from long-term harvested wood products in carbon abatement projects

S. Sharma, M. Telfer, Samuel T.G. Phua
{"title":"Comparison of approaches and functions for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from long-term harvested wood products in carbon abatement projects","authors":"S. Sharma, M. Telfer, Samuel T.G. Phua","doi":"10.1080/20430779.2013.820631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long-term harvested wood products (Lt-HWPs) are not released to the atmosphere immediately after tree harvesting, but retire over a period of time depending on the types of their uses. Two different approaches, one accounting for carbon emissions from possible end of life pathways after retirement of HWPs and another assuming immediate carbon release, were applied to the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) approved Improved Forest Management-Logged Protected Forest project in Australia. Exponential and logistic functions using Tier 2 parameters were used to track the annual retirement from Lt-HWPs and compared the results to exponential (Winjum et al. parameters) function and linear 20 years (VCS method). Exponential (Winjum et al. parameters) function with the immediate release of carbon that retire/decay annually generated the lowest greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (69,382 tCO2-e), followed by exponential (Tier 2) function with 234,628 tCO2-e. Linear 20-year (VCS method) generated the highest GHG emissions among all methods (367,299 tCO2-e) over 25 project crediting period. For a project producing sawnwood (30%), exponential function (Winjum et al. parameters) also produced the lowest estimation of GHG emissions from Lt-HWPs. Although the exponential annual decay (Winjum et al. parameters) function which assumes immediate carbon release, generated the lowest GHG emission from Lt-HWPs in the temperate climatic region, the end of life pathway approach employing exponential or logistic functions with Tier 2 parameters, can simulate carbon emissions from Lt-HWPs more accurately and yield an unbiased estimation of GHG emission from HWPs, Interestingly, linear 20-year (VCS method) using a fixed timeframe of a 20-year linear function was neither found conservative in terms of net GHG emissions, nor flexible enough to take into account different wood product types and climatic region specific decay rates that may vary with project location and forest types.","PeriodicalId":411329,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","volume":"272 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2013.820631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Long-term harvested wood products (Lt-HWPs) are not released to the atmosphere immediately after tree harvesting, but retire over a period of time depending on the types of their uses. Two different approaches, one accounting for carbon emissions from possible end of life pathways after retirement of HWPs and another assuming immediate carbon release, were applied to the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) approved Improved Forest Management-Logged Protected Forest project in Australia. Exponential and logistic functions using Tier 2 parameters were used to track the annual retirement from Lt-HWPs and compared the results to exponential (Winjum et al. parameters) function and linear 20 years (VCS method). Exponential (Winjum et al. parameters) function with the immediate release of carbon that retire/decay annually generated the lowest greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (69,382 tCO2-e), followed by exponential (Tier 2) function with 234,628 tCO2-e. Linear 20-year (VCS method) generated the highest GHG emissions among all methods (367,299 tCO2-e) over 25 project crediting period. For a project producing sawnwood (30%), exponential function (Winjum et al. parameters) also produced the lowest estimation of GHG emissions from Lt-HWPs. Although the exponential annual decay (Winjum et al. parameters) function which assumes immediate carbon release, generated the lowest GHG emission from Lt-HWPs in the temperate climatic region, the end of life pathway approach employing exponential or logistic functions with Tier 2 parameters, can simulate carbon emissions from Lt-HWPs more accurately and yield an unbiased estimation of GHG emission from HWPs, Interestingly, linear 20-year (VCS method) using a fixed timeframe of a 20-year linear function was neither found conservative in terms of net GHG emissions, nor flexible enough to take into account different wood product types and climatic region specific decay rates that may vary with project location and forest types.
碳减排项目中长期采伐木制品温室气体排放估算方法和函数的比较
长期采伐的木材产品(Lt-HWPs)在树木采伐后不会立即释放到大气中,而是根据其用途类型在一段时间内退役。两种不同的方法,一种是考虑hwp退役后可能的生命终结途径的碳排放,另一种是假设立即的碳释放,应用于澳大利亚经验证的碳标准(VCS)批准的改善森林管理-采伐保护森林项目。使用Tier 2参数的指数函数和逻辑函数来跟踪lt - hwp的年退休情况,并将结果与指数函数(Winjum等参数)和线性20年(VCS方法)进行比较。指数(Winjum等参数)函数与碳的立即释放,退休/衰变每年产生最低的温室气体(GHG)排放量(69,382 tCO2-e),其次是指数(第2层)函数与234,628 tCO2-e。线性20年(VCS)方法在25个项目信用期内产生的温室气体排放量最高(367,299吨co2 -e)。对于生产锯木(30%)的项目,指数函数(Winjum等参数)也产生了Lt-HWPs的最低温室气体排放估计值。尽管假设碳立即释放的指数年衰减(Winjum等参数)函数在温带气候区产生了Lt-HWPs最低的温室气体排放,但使用具有Tier 2参数的指数或逻辑函数的生命终止途径方法可以更准确地模拟Lt-HWPs的碳排放,并对HWPs的温室气体排放产生无偏估计。线性20年(VCS)方法使用20年线性函数的固定时间框架,在温室气体净排放量方面既不保守,也不够灵活,不能考虑到不同的木材产品类型和气候区域特定的腐烂率,这些腐烂率可能随项目地点和森林类型而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信