The American Millennial Attraction to Socialism: Comparing the Economies of Chinese Communism, Crony Corporate Capitalism, European Crony Socialism, and the American Free Enterprise Entrepreneurial Economy

Laurie Thomas Vass
{"title":"The American Millennial Attraction to Socialism: Comparing the Economies of Chinese Communism, Crony Corporate Capitalism, European Crony Socialism, and the American Free Enterprise Entrepreneurial Economy","authors":"Laurie Thomas Vass","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3553839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much of the academic analysis of American crony corporate capitalist economy addresses the micro economic effect on how individual firms use political influence to skew financial benefits to themselves.<br><br>The more damaging economic effect of crony capitalism is on the functioning of the national macro economy that has resulted in a bifurcated economic structure, comprised of large global firms who promote and benefit from global trade, and smaller regional firms located in 350 metro regions, who are not economically integrated into the globalist networks.<br><br>Paul Aligica and Vlad Tarko describe the difference between the global macro crony capitalism and the more conventional micro economic cronyism. <br><br>They state, <br><br>“(Micro economic cronyism) refers to insiders and businesses securing narrow tax, spending, and regulatory advantages. Cronyism is one cause of wealth inequality…Crony exchanges are based on trust, loyalty, family and long-standing social networks. <br><br>(Macro economic cronysism) refers to changes of laws at the top (Congressional) level as a result of lobbying and crony relations. The (change in laws) affects the entire industry, whereas bribery (in micro economic cronysism) tends to be firm-specific and with much smaller spillover effects on reducing competition.” (Paul Aligicia and Vlad Tarko, Crony Capitalism: Rent Seeking, Institutions and Ideology, Kyklos, May, 2014).","PeriodicalId":208075,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3553839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much of the academic analysis of American crony corporate capitalist economy addresses the micro economic effect on how individual firms use political influence to skew financial benefits to themselves.

The more damaging economic effect of crony capitalism is on the functioning of the national macro economy that has resulted in a bifurcated economic structure, comprised of large global firms who promote and benefit from global trade, and smaller regional firms located in 350 metro regions, who are not economically integrated into the globalist networks.

Paul Aligica and Vlad Tarko describe the difference between the global macro crony capitalism and the more conventional micro economic cronyism.

They state,

“(Micro economic cronyism) refers to insiders and businesses securing narrow tax, spending, and regulatory advantages. Cronyism is one cause of wealth inequality…Crony exchanges are based on trust, loyalty, family and long-standing social networks.

(Macro economic cronysism) refers to changes of laws at the top (Congressional) level as a result of lobbying and crony relations. The (change in laws) affects the entire industry, whereas bribery (in micro economic cronysism) tends to be firm-specific and with much smaller spillover effects on reducing competition.” (Paul Aligicia and Vlad Tarko, Crony Capitalism: Rent Seeking, Institutions and Ideology, Kyklos, May, 2014).
美国千禧一代对社会主义的吸引力:比较中国共产主义、裙带企业资本主义、欧洲裙带社会主义和美国自由企业经济
对美国裙带企业资本主义经济的许多学术分析都关注个体企业如何利用政治影响力为自己谋取经济利益的微观经济效应。裙带资本主义更具破坏性的经济影响是对国家宏观经济运作的影响,它导致了一个分裂的经济结构,由促进全球贸易并从中受益的大型全球公司和位于350个大都市地区的小型区域公司组成,这些公司在经济上没有融入全球主义网络。Paul Aligica和Vlad Tarko描述了全球宏观裙带资本主义与更传统的微观裙带资本主义之间的区别。他们指出,“(微观经济任人唯亲)是指内部人士和企业获得狭隘的税收、支出和监管优势。裙带关系是造成财富不平等的原因之一……裙带关系的交换是建立在信任、忠诚、家庭和长期存在的社会网络的基础上的。(宏观经济任人唯亲)指的是由于游说和裙带关系导致高层(国会)的法律变化。(法律的变化)影响整个行业,而贿赂(在微观经济的裙带关系中)往往是特定于公司的,对减少竞争的溢出效应要小得多。(Paul Aligicia和Vlad Tarko,《裙带资本主义:寻租、制度和意识形态》,Kyklos, 2014年5月)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信