Too Much Global Liquidity from Central Banks Distorts Financial Markets and Undermines Economic Growth

William J. Dodwell
{"title":"Too Much Global Liquidity from Central Banks Distorts Financial Markets and Undermines Economic Growth","authors":"William J. Dodwell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2408174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis and the ensuing global recession central banks flooded the financial system with liquidity to overcome fears of contagion that froze the credit markets and threatened the solvency of major banks. Accordingly, the Federal Reserve Bank along with central banks in Europe, China, Japan and elsewhere engaged in quantitative easing involving the purchase of respective sovereign debt securities creating money in the process. As a consequence, interest rates have been at historic lows to accommodate economic recovery. While initially beneficial for calming the financial markets and jump-starting the economy, five years hence aggressive monetary policy still has failed to achieve the economic growth required to create jobs and restore prosperity. Rather, abundant global liquidity and attendant low interest rates have inflated stock prices, encouraged risky investing in the chase for higher returns, devalued currencies in a race to the bottom to compete in export markets, and inflated commodity prices until slow growth in China curtailed demand. In addition, the low interest rates suppress discipline in government borrowing while sovereign debt hovers at crisis levels. Meanwhile, savers are punished to the detriment of the economy as the national income that would have been generated by normal interest rates is forfeited. Furthermore, many speculate about potential inflation arising from all the liquidity when robust growth resumes.Rather than create potential asset bubbles in the financial markets, significant fiscal reform is needed to revive the real economy from its protracted slow growth pattern. Tax cuts, spending reduction and regulatory relief encourage investment in plant, equipment and inventory that creates jobs that stimulate the consumer sector. Indeed, such policy would break the logjam created by uncertainty about taxes, regulation and the activities of the Fed. Tax increases on the wealthy are counterproductive. Sequestration is hardly enough. Stifling energy production is irresponsible. And continued monetary interference is ineffective.","PeriodicalId":233460,"journal":{"name":"Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Research Paper Series","volume":"365 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2408174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis and the ensuing global recession central banks flooded the financial system with liquidity to overcome fears of contagion that froze the credit markets and threatened the solvency of major banks. Accordingly, the Federal Reserve Bank along with central banks in Europe, China, Japan and elsewhere engaged in quantitative easing involving the purchase of respective sovereign debt securities creating money in the process. As a consequence, interest rates have been at historic lows to accommodate economic recovery. While initially beneficial for calming the financial markets and jump-starting the economy, five years hence aggressive monetary policy still has failed to achieve the economic growth required to create jobs and restore prosperity. Rather, abundant global liquidity and attendant low interest rates have inflated stock prices, encouraged risky investing in the chase for higher returns, devalued currencies in a race to the bottom to compete in export markets, and inflated commodity prices until slow growth in China curtailed demand. In addition, the low interest rates suppress discipline in government borrowing while sovereign debt hovers at crisis levels. Meanwhile, savers are punished to the detriment of the economy as the national income that would have been generated by normal interest rates is forfeited. Furthermore, many speculate about potential inflation arising from all the liquidity when robust growth resumes.Rather than create potential asset bubbles in the financial markets, significant fiscal reform is needed to revive the real economy from its protracted slow growth pattern. Tax cuts, spending reduction and regulatory relief encourage investment in plant, equipment and inventory that creates jobs that stimulate the consumer sector. Indeed, such policy would break the logjam created by uncertainty about taxes, regulation and the activities of the Fed. Tax increases on the wealthy are counterproductive. Sequestration is hardly enough. Stifling energy production is irresponsible. And continued monetary interference is ineffective.
来自央行的过多全球流动性扭曲了金融市场,破坏了经济增长
在2008年金融危机和随之而来的全球经济衰退之后,各国央行向金融体系注入了大量流动性,以克服对危机蔓延的担忧,这种担忧导致信贷市场冻结,并威胁到主要银行的偿付能力。因此,美联储与欧洲、中国、日本和其他地方的央行一起实施了量化宽松政策,包括购买各自的主权债务证券,在此过程中创造货币。因此,为适应经济复苏,利率一直处于历史低位。虽然激进的货币政策最初有助于稳定金融市场和启动经济,但五年之后,仍未能实现创造就业和恢复繁荣所需的经济增长。相反,充足的全球流动性和随之而来的低利率推高了股价,鼓励了为追求更高回报而进行的高风险投资,促使货币竞相贬值以在出口市场竞争,并推高了大宗商品价格,直到中国经济增长放缓抑制了需求。此外,低利率抑制了政府借贷的纪律,而主权债务却徘徊在危机水平。与此同时,储户受到了损害经济的惩罚,因为正常利率产生的国民收入将被没收。此外,许多人猜测,当经济恢复强劲增长时,所有流动性可能引发通胀。为了使实体经济摆脱长期缓慢增长的模式,中国需要进行重大的财政改革,而不是在金融市场上制造潜在的资产泡沫。减税、削减支出和放松监管鼓励对工厂、设备和库存的投资,从而创造就业机会,刺激消费部门。事实上,这样的政策将打破税收、监管和美联储活动的不确定性所造成的僵局。对富人增税只会适得其反。自动减支是远远不够的。抑制能源生产是不负责任的。持续的货币干预是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信