The Asian Economy: Trade Structure Interpreted by Feedback Loop Analysis

M. Sonis, J. Guilhoto, G. Hewings
{"title":"The Asian Economy: Trade Structure Interpreted by Feedback Loop Analysis","authors":"M. Sonis, J. Guilhoto, G. Hewings","doi":"10.2457/SRS.25.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent discussions that focused on the problems of the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade [GATT] together with the emergence of strengthened and expanded free trade areas [such as NAFTA, European Union and MERCOSUL/MERCOSUR] have created the need for careful analysis of the nature of internal and external dependence among nations and, within any nation, among the constituent regions. The picture that is obtained from inspection of import and export flows is only one (and often the smaller) part of the nature of dependence; there is a need to consider the indirect effects and, in addition, the possible feedbacks that may accrue from expansion of links between any two countries rippling through a broader set of economies and returning to expand activity in the originating economy. However, until recently, a dearth of data precluded the type of analysis conducted here; the development of consistent intercountry input-output tables for Europe enabled the first attempt at an understanding of intercountry dependencies (see Sonis, Oosterhaven and Hewings, 1993). This paper will explore similar perspectives with a set of Asian intercountry input-output tables for 1985. In this paper, some new perspectives are advanced that provide a more comprehensive view of the interactions between the economies of Asia. The analysis focuses on the potential for uncovering alternative perspectives about the role of linkages and multipliers in input-output systems. The analysis draws on some pioneering work by Miyazawa in the identification of internal and external multiplier effects. Paths of direct and indirect dependency are revealed as well as the nature and strength of feedback loops. In addition, some potential exists for contibutions to the debate raised by Krugman (1991, 1993) on the role of regionalism versus multilaterialism. Using these methods, it is possible to provide insights into the way in which these economies are integrated, the strength of the integration and the potential consequences of action in one economy on the rest of the system. The analysis parallels some earlier work on the European economies and will provide the basis for future comparative analysis as updated tables are produced.","PeriodicalId":350397,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Input-Output Tables & Analysis (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Input-Output Tables & Analysis (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2457/SRS.25.291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The recent discussions that focused on the problems of the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade [GATT] together with the emergence of strengthened and expanded free trade areas [such as NAFTA, European Union and MERCOSUL/MERCOSUR] have created the need for careful analysis of the nature of internal and external dependence among nations and, within any nation, among the constituent regions. The picture that is obtained from inspection of import and export flows is only one (and often the smaller) part of the nature of dependence; there is a need to consider the indirect effects and, in addition, the possible feedbacks that may accrue from expansion of links between any two countries rippling through a broader set of economies and returning to expand activity in the originating economy. However, until recently, a dearth of data precluded the type of analysis conducted here; the development of consistent intercountry input-output tables for Europe enabled the first attempt at an understanding of intercountry dependencies (see Sonis, Oosterhaven and Hewings, 1993). This paper will explore similar perspectives with a set of Asian intercountry input-output tables for 1985. In this paper, some new perspectives are advanced that provide a more comprehensive view of the interactions between the economies of Asia. The analysis focuses on the potential for uncovering alternative perspectives about the role of linkages and multipliers in input-output systems. The analysis draws on some pioneering work by Miyazawa in the identification of internal and external multiplier effects. Paths of direct and indirect dependency are revealed as well as the nature and strength of feedback loops. In addition, some potential exists for contibutions to the debate raised by Krugman (1991, 1993) on the role of regionalism versus multilaterialism. Using these methods, it is possible to provide insights into the way in which these economies are integrated, the strength of the integration and the potential consequences of action in one economy on the rest of the system. The analysis parallels some earlier work on the European economies and will provide the basis for future comparative analysis as updated tables are produced.
亚洲经济:用反馈环分析解释的贸易结构
最近的讨论集中在关税及贸易总协定(关贸总协定)乌拉圭回合的问题上,同时出现了得到加强和扩大的自由贸易区[如北美自由贸易协定、欧洲联盟和南方共同市场],因此有必要仔细分析各国之间以及任何国家内部各组成区域之间的内部和外部依赖的性质。从对进出口流动的检查中得到的情况只是依赖性质的一部分(而且往往是较小的一部分);有必要考虑到任何两个国家之间联系的扩大所产生的间接影响,以及可能产生的反馈,这种反馈会波及到更广泛的经济体系,并反过来扩大原经济的活动。然而,直到最近,数据的缺乏阻碍了这里进行的这种分析;为欧洲制定一致的国家间投入产出表使人们第一次尝试了解国家间的依赖关系(见Sonis、Oosterhaven和Hewings, 1993年)。本文将用一套1985年亚洲国家间投入产出表探讨类似的观点。本文提出了一些新的观点,对亚洲经济之间的相互作用提供了一个更全面的看法。分析的重点是揭示关于投入产出系统中联系和乘数作用的其他观点的潜力。这一分析借鉴了宫泽明在识别内部和外部乘数效应方面的一些开创性工作。揭示了直接和间接依赖的路径以及反馈回路的性质和强度。此外,对克鲁格曼(1991,1993)提出的关于区域主义与多边主义的作用的辩论也有一些潜在的贡献。利用这些方法,有可能深入了解这些经济体的整合方式、整合的强度以及一个经济体的行动对系统其他部分的潜在后果。这项分析与早期关于欧洲经济的一些工作相类似,并将在编制更新的表格时为今后的比较分析提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信