{"title":"Clinical pharmacodynamics of rocuronium: orbicularis oculi versus adductor pollicis","authors":"冉建, 欧阳葆怡","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-634X.2006.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"目的 比较罗库溴铵对眼轮匝肌和拇收肌临床药效学的差异.方法 选择心、肺、肝、肾和神经肌肉功能基本正常的30~50岁全麻普外及妇科手术患者男女各10例,丙泊酚和芬太尼维持麻醉.静注罗库溴铵0.3 mg/kg后,记录同侧眼轮匝肌和拇收肌诱发颤搐反应的抑制过程和恢复过程.结果 拇收肌的显效时间和达到最大抑制程度的时间[(41.0±8.3)s和(241.3±60.8)s]与眼轮匝肌[(42.0±7.9)s和(276.0±62.6)s]基本相同(P>0.05),而最大抑制程度(95.3%±5.2%)比服轮匝肌(67.7%±15.3%)显著增高(P<0.01).T1(4个成串刺激中的第1个肌颤搐反应)恢复到基础值50%和75%的时间,拇收肌[(19.8±5.1)min和(24.1±6.2)min]与眼轮匝肌的[(17.5±8.7)min和(27.3±8.6)min]差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但T1恢复到基础值95%和100%的时间,拇收肌[(29.2±7.6)min和(31.1±8.3)min]明显比眼轮匝肌[(37.4±9.0)min和(40.0±9.1)min]快,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).TOFr恢复到基础值80%的时间,拇收肌[(30.2±8.1)min]和眼轮匝肌[(28.8±8.8)min]基本相同(P>0.05).结论 中青年患者给予1倍ED95罗库溴铵对眼轮匝肌和拇收肌阻滞过程的差异主要表现在眼轮匝肌最大阻滞程度显著比拇收肌低,以及肌肉松弛效应完全消除时间显著比拇收肌长,而起效时间则基本相同。","PeriodicalId":189947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Clinical Medical Bioengineering","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Clinical Medical Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-634X.2006.06.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}