Effect of a Health Education Intervention on Practices of Hospital Laboratory Staff; A Quasi-Experimental Study

PJMD 12-3 Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.36283/pjmd12-3/007
Imrana Saeed, M. Sadiq, Faizan Fazal, Alishba Shezal, F. Shahid, Muniba Zafar, Noor Mahal Azam, Q. Ain, Manahil Nazir, A. Noor
{"title":"Effect of a Health Education Intervention on Practices of Hospital Laboratory Staff; A Quasi-Experimental Study","authors":"Imrana Saeed, M. Sadiq, Faizan Fazal, Alishba Shezal, F. Shahid, Muniba Zafar, Noor Mahal Azam, Q. Ain, Manahil Nazir, A. Noor","doi":"10.36283/pjmd12-3/007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The incidence of Laboratory acquired infections is on the rise despite the existence and continuous upgradation of infection prevention protocols. The objective of this study was to determine the practice of lab staff before and after carrying out an intervention in the form of health education intervention based on WHO protocols for infection prevention.\n\nMethods: This is a Quasi-experimental study carried out in three hospitals in Rawalpindi. A total of n=38 technical and non-technical lab staff participated in the study. Laboratory practices were observed by the researchers themselves for a week. Then an education session was conducted for the staff regarding the World Health Organization (WHO) standard protocols for infection control. The post-intervention data were collected after about two weeks of health education sessions. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22. Paired t-test was applied to compare the mean scores of pre- and post-interventional data.\n\nResults: The laboratory staff participated in the study mostly 19(50%) belonging to the age(years) range of 20-27. The percentage of respondents having good practice of infection prevention protocols before intervention was 7.5%, after the intervention this increased to 57.9%. Paired t-test showed that the difference in practice mean score of pre- and post-interventional data was statistically significant (CI=21.55-15.33 p-value=0.001).\n\nConclusion: Pre-intervention data showed that the practice of the staff was not completely in accordance with WHO infection prevention. After delivering the education session on WHO infection prevention protocols, there was a significant improvement in the practices of laboratory staff.","PeriodicalId":422346,"journal":{"name":"PJMD 12-3","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PJMD 12-3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36283/pjmd12-3/007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of Laboratory acquired infections is on the rise despite the existence and continuous upgradation of infection prevention protocols. The objective of this study was to determine the practice of lab staff before and after carrying out an intervention in the form of health education intervention based on WHO protocols for infection prevention. Methods: This is a Quasi-experimental study carried out in three hospitals in Rawalpindi. A total of n=38 technical and non-technical lab staff participated in the study. Laboratory practices were observed by the researchers themselves for a week. Then an education session was conducted for the staff regarding the World Health Organization (WHO) standard protocols for infection control. The post-intervention data were collected after about two weeks of health education sessions. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22. Paired t-test was applied to compare the mean scores of pre- and post-interventional data. Results: The laboratory staff participated in the study mostly 19(50%) belonging to the age(years) range of 20-27. The percentage of respondents having good practice of infection prevention protocols before intervention was 7.5%, after the intervention this increased to 57.9%. Paired t-test showed that the difference in practice mean score of pre- and post-interventional data was statistically significant (CI=21.55-15.33 p-value=0.001). Conclusion: Pre-intervention data showed that the practice of the staff was not completely in accordance with WHO infection prevention. After delivering the education session on WHO infection prevention protocols, there was a significant improvement in the practices of laboratory staff.
健康教育干预对医院检验人员执业行为的影响准实验研究
背景:尽管感染预防方案存在并不断升级,但实验室获得性感染的发生率仍在上升。本研究的目的是确定实验室工作人员在实施基于世卫组织预防感染方案的健康教育干预之前和之后的做法。方法:在拉瓦尔品第三家医院进行准实验研究。共有n=38名实验室技术人员和非技术人员参与了本研究。实验室实践由研究人员自己观察了一周。然后为工作人员举办了一次关于世界卫生组织(卫生组织)感染控制标准规程的教育会议。干预后的数据是在大约两周的健康教育课程后收集的。数据分析采用SPSS version 22。采用配对t检验比较介入前后资料的平均得分。结果:参与研究的实验室工作人员19人(50%),年龄在20 ~ 27岁之间。干预前对感染预防方案有良好实践的应答者比例为7.5%,干预后这一比例增加到57.9%。配对t检验显示,介入前后资料的实践均分差异有统计学意义(CI=21.55 ~ 15.33, p值=0.001)。结论:干预前数据显示,工作人员的做法不完全符合世卫组织的感染预防要求。在举办了世卫组织感染预防方案教育会议后,实验室工作人员的做法有了显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信