Adaptability: Conceptual and Empirical Perspectives on Responses to Change, Novelty and Uncertainty

Andrew J. Martin, H. Nejad, S. Colmar, G. Liem
{"title":"Adaptability: Conceptual and Empirical Perspectives on Responses to Change, Novelty and Uncertainty","authors":"Andrew J. Martin, H. Nejad, S. Colmar, G. Liem","doi":"10.1017/jgc.2012.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adaptability is proposed as individuals’ capacity to constructively regulate psycho-behavioral functions in response to new, changing, and/or uncertain circumstances, conditions and situations. The present investigation explored the internal and external validity of an hypothesised adaptability scale. The sample comprised 2,731 high school students. In terms of internal validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) suggested a reliable higher order adaptability factor subsumed by a reliable first order cognitive-behavioural factor and a reliable first order affective factor. Multi-group CFA indicated invariance in factor structure as a function of gender, age, and language background. Further, age (younger adolescents), language background (non-English speaking), and parents’ education (higher levels) predicted higher order adaptability, while gender (males) predicted first order affective adaptability. In terms of external validity, consistent with hypotheses, higher and first order adaptability was differentially associated with cognate/aligned factors (personality, implicit theories of ability, buoyancy) and also with psycho-educational wellbeing ‘outcome’ factors (achievement, enjoyment of school, meaning and purpose, life satisfaction). Findings hold theoretical and empirical implications for researchers and practitioners seeking to better understand the constructive regulation of individuals confronted with situations involving novelty, change, and uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":102318,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"158","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2012.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 158

Abstract

Adaptability is proposed as individuals’ capacity to constructively regulate psycho-behavioral functions in response to new, changing, and/or uncertain circumstances, conditions and situations. The present investigation explored the internal and external validity of an hypothesised adaptability scale. The sample comprised 2,731 high school students. In terms of internal validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) suggested a reliable higher order adaptability factor subsumed by a reliable first order cognitive-behavioural factor and a reliable first order affective factor. Multi-group CFA indicated invariance in factor structure as a function of gender, age, and language background. Further, age (younger adolescents), language background (non-English speaking), and parents’ education (higher levels) predicted higher order adaptability, while gender (males) predicted first order affective adaptability. In terms of external validity, consistent with hypotheses, higher and first order adaptability was differentially associated with cognate/aligned factors (personality, implicit theories of ability, buoyancy) and also with psycho-educational wellbeing ‘outcome’ factors (achievement, enjoyment of school, meaning and purpose, life satisfaction). Findings hold theoretical and empirical implications for researchers and practitioners seeking to better understand the constructive regulation of individuals confronted with situations involving novelty, change, and uncertainty.
适应性:对变化、新颖性和不确定性反应的概念和实证观点
适应性被认为是个体在应对新的、变化的和/或不确定的环境、条件和情况时建设性地调节心理行为功能的能力。本研究探讨了一个假设的适应性量表的内部效度和外部效度。样本包括2731名高中生。在内部效度方面,探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析(EFA和CFA)表明,高阶适应性因子由一阶认知行为因子和一阶情感因子组成。多组CFA显示,性别、年龄和语言背景的因素结构不变性。此外,年龄(青少年)、语言背景(非英语国家)和父母教育程度(较高水平)预测高阶适应性,而性别(男性)预测一阶情感适应性。在外部效度方面,与假设一致,高阶和一阶适应性与同源/一致因素(人格、内隐能力理论、乐观)以及心理教育健康“结果”因素(成就、学校享受、意义和目的、生活满意度)存在差异。研究结果对研究人员和从业者寻求更好地理解个体在面对新奇、变化和不确定性情况时的建设性调节具有理论和实证意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信