Empirical Testing of Purchasing Power Parity Validity in Selected European Union Countries

Jelko Plošinjak, Mejra Festić
{"title":"Empirical Testing of Purchasing Power Parity Validity in Selected European Union Countries","authors":"Jelko Plošinjak, Mejra Festić","doi":"10.2478/ngoe-2021-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, the authors carried out an empirical analysis of the validity of purchasing power parity (PPP) in Slovenia, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Austria. The results provide mixed support for PPP, which is typical for extransition economies. In the first phase of the empirical part of the research, the authors tested the stationarity of the real exchange rate in a logarithm, while in the second phase, the cointegration of nominal exchange rate, domestic and foreign price levels was tested.The Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) was used in the third phase to test if the signs of variables are in accordance with economics and econometrics theories, while in the final phase, restrictions were imposed for the symmetry and proportionality of coefficients. Slovenia is subject to limitations on the symmetry and proportionality of coefficients, which means the validity of both the absolute and relative versions of the PPP theory. Croatia is subject to a limitation on symmetry, but not to a limit on the proportionality of coefficients, which means the validity of the relative version of the PPP theory. In the case of the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Austria, restrictions on the symmetry and proportionality of the coefficients do not apply, which consequently constitutes an invalidity of both versions. However, to the authors’ knowledge, and taking into account Liu (1992), who states that it is more important to check the presence of co-integration than to check the symmetry and proportionality of the coefficients, since there is a cointegratation between the nominal exchange rate, foreign prices and domestic prices, the theory of PPP is valid for all the selected countries. The empirical results suggest that all the real exchange rate time series are stationary, additionally, cointegration exists among all the variables for all countries, and the signs of coefficients are statistically significant for all variables in all countries, however, the coefficient restrictions are only statistically significant in Slovenia and Croatia.","PeriodicalId":228142,"journal":{"name":"Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2021-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In this article, the authors carried out an empirical analysis of the validity of purchasing power parity (PPP) in Slovenia, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Austria. The results provide mixed support for PPP, which is typical for extransition economies. In the first phase of the empirical part of the research, the authors tested the stationarity of the real exchange rate in a logarithm, while in the second phase, the cointegration of nominal exchange rate, domestic and foreign price levels was tested.The Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) was used in the third phase to test if the signs of variables are in accordance with economics and econometrics theories, while in the final phase, restrictions were imposed for the symmetry and proportionality of coefficients. Slovenia is subject to limitations on the symmetry and proportionality of coefficients, which means the validity of both the absolute and relative versions of the PPP theory. Croatia is subject to a limitation on symmetry, but not to a limit on the proportionality of coefficients, which means the validity of the relative version of the PPP theory. In the case of the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Austria, restrictions on the symmetry and proportionality of the coefficients do not apply, which consequently constitutes an invalidity of both versions. However, to the authors’ knowledge, and taking into account Liu (1992), who states that it is more important to check the presence of co-integration than to check the symmetry and proportionality of the coefficients, since there is a cointegratation between the nominal exchange rate, foreign prices and domestic prices, the theory of PPP is valid for all the selected countries. The empirical results suggest that all the real exchange rate time series are stationary, additionally, cointegration exists among all the variables for all countries, and the signs of coefficients are statistically significant for all variables in all countries, however, the coefficient restrictions are only statistically significant in Slovenia and Croatia.
部分欧盟国家购买力平价有效性的实证检验
摘要本文对斯洛文尼亚、克罗地亚、捷克、斯洛伐克和奥地利的购买力平价(PPP)有效性进行了实证分析。研究结果对购买力平价提供了褒贬不一的支持,这在转型经济体中是典型的。在实证研究的第一阶段,作者检验了实际汇率的对数平稳性,而在第二阶段,作者检验了名义汇率与国内外价格水平的协整关系。第三阶段使用向量误差修正模型(VECM)来检验变量的符号是否符合经济学和计量经济学理论,而在最后阶段,对系数的对称性和比例性进行限制。斯洛文尼亚在系数的对称性和比例性方面受到限制,这意味着购买力平价理论的绝对和相对版本都是有效的。克罗地亚的对称性受到限制,但系数的比例性没有限制,这意味着购买力平价理论的相对版本的有效性。在捷克共和国、斯洛伐克和奥地利的情况下,对系数的对称性和比例性的限制不适用,因此构成两种说法的无效。然而,据作者所知,并考虑到Liu(1992),他指出检查协整的存在比检查系数的对称性和比例性更重要,因为名义汇率、国外价格和国内价格之间存在协整,购买力平价理论对所有选定的国家都有效。实证结果表明,所有实际汇率时间序列都是平稳的,并且所有国家的所有变量之间都存在协整,所有国家的所有变量的系数符号都具有统计显著性,但只有斯洛文尼亚和克罗地亚的系数限制具有统计显著性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信