Comparison of Virtual and Conventional Synchronous Generators Based on a Modularized Analysis Tool

Jia-Yang Ruan, R. Cai, Xing Huang, Hailian Xie
{"title":"Comparison of Virtual and Conventional Synchronous Generators Based on a Modularized Analysis Tool","authors":"Jia-Yang Ruan, R. Cai, Xing Huang, Hailian Xie","doi":"10.1109/CICED.2018.8592294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is questionable that if virtual and conventional synchronous generators could provide identical dynamic support to the power system. In order to summarize the difference, this paper introduces a MIMO-based analysis tool for modelling power systems integrated by conventional or power-electronic interfaced generators. The scalable tool is used to test modelling accuracy of individual generators using dynamic simulation. For small-signal stability analysis, the tool does linearization based on MIMO models, and then couple all generators/loads though the passive network, with the network transient included. During transient stability analysis, VSG's ability to emulate SG's dynamic responses depends on whether the converter has a strong overloading limit, and the current control loop is tuned fast. In practice this could be hard to realize, considering that the converter's current limit is slightly higher than 1.0, and thus the current controller tends to be easily saturated during voltage sags, and the VSG could enter constant-power mode. During small disturbances, VSG could have a low-frequency inertia response similar to SG, yet it can introduce new oscillation modes, depending on the control parameter configuration. Due to lack of stator-flux transient modelling, the high-frequency oscillation of VSG is evidently deviated from that of SG.","PeriodicalId":142885,"journal":{"name":"2018 China International Conference on Electricity Distribution (CICED)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 China International Conference on Electricity Distribution (CICED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CICED.2018.8592294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is questionable that if virtual and conventional synchronous generators could provide identical dynamic support to the power system. In order to summarize the difference, this paper introduces a MIMO-based analysis tool for modelling power systems integrated by conventional or power-electronic interfaced generators. The scalable tool is used to test modelling accuracy of individual generators using dynamic simulation. For small-signal stability analysis, the tool does linearization based on MIMO models, and then couple all generators/loads though the passive network, with the network transient included. During transient stability analysis, VSG's ability to emulate SG's dynamic responses depends on whether the converter has a strong overloading limit, and the current control loop is tuned fast. In practice this could be hard to realize, considering that the converter's current limit is slightly higher than 1.0, and thus the current controller tends to be easily saturated during voltage sags, and the VSG could enter constant-power mode. During small disturbances, VSG could have a low-frequency inertia response similar to SG, yet it can introduce new oscillation modes, depending on the control parameter configuration. Due to lack of stator-flux transient modelling, the high-frequency oscillation of VSG is evidently deviated from that of SG.
基于模块化分析工具的虚拟与传统同步发电机的比较
虚拟同步发电机和传统同步发电机能否为电力系统提供相同的动力支持是一个问题。为了总结两者的区别,本文介绍了一种基于mimo的分析工具,用于对传统或电力电子接口发电机集成的电力系统进行建模。该可扩展工具通过动态仿真测试了单个发电机的建模精度。对于小信号稳定性分析,该工具基于MIMO模型进行线性化,然后通过无源网络耦合所有发电机/负载,包括网络暂态。在暂态稳定性分析中,VSG模拟SG动态响应的能力取决于变换器是否具有较强的过载限制,并且电流控制回路调整速度快。在实际中,这可能很难实现,因为变换器的限流略高于1.0,因此电流控制器在电压下降时容易饱和,VSG可能进入恒功率模式。在小扰动时,VSG可能具有类似于SG的低频惯性响应,但它可以引入新的振荡模式,这取决于控制参数配置。由于缺乏定子-磁链瞬态模型,VSG的高频振荡与SG明显偏离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信