Comparative study of thermal efficiency of flat spiral vs. conical spiral in a parabolic solar collector

Tomás Avalos-Sanchez, Patricia Robles-Velazquez, M. Prado-Salazar
{"title":"Comparative study of thermal efficiency of flat spiral vs. conical spiral in a parabolic solar collector","authors":"Tomás Avalos-Sanchez, Patricia Robles-Velazquez, M. Prado-Salazar","doi":"10.35429/ejt.2020.8.4.24.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compare the thermal efficiency of two kind of heat by radiant energy concentrated by a parabolic solar collector. Methodology: became two spirals with 1.3 m length and diameter 3/8” copper pipe, which were controlled water flow from one step and recirculated making temperature measurements to water in container return and readings taken every 5 minutes. These coils were placed at the focal point of a parabolic solar collector of 77 cm in diameter and concavity of 6.6 cm. both proved to be very efficient in heat absorption and transmission to the water into itself, which showed greater heat loss but was the conical, although it wasn't exposed to air currents and that it had an aluminum housing. Meanwhile the flat spiral showed greater uniformity in the behavior of temperatures despite being exposed to air currents.The maximum temperature reached, at a flow rate of 0.15 l/min, was 97.5 ° C in 30 minutes from the initial temperature. Lower flows did not allow to make a reliable temperature reading since the water was going into its vapor phase.","PeriodicalId":356684,"journal":{"name":"ECORFAN Journal Taiwan","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECORFAN Journal Taiwan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35429/ejt.2020.8.4.24.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compare the thermal efficiency of two kind of heat by radiant energy concentrated by a parabolic solar collector. Methodology: became two spirals with 1.3 m length and diameter 3/8” copper pipe, which were controlled water flow from one step and recirculated making temperature measurements to water in container return and readings taken every 5 minutes. These coils were placed at the focal point of a parabolic solar collector of 77 cm in diameter and concavity of 6.6 cm. both proved to be very efficient in heat absorption and transmission to the water into itself, which showed greater heat loss but was the conical, although it wasn't exposed to air currents and that it had an aluminum housing. Meanwhile the flat spiral showed greater uniformity in the behavior of temperatures despite being exposed to air currents.The maximum temperature reached, at a flow rate of 0.15 l/min, was 97.5 ° C in 30 minutes from the initial temperature. Lower flows did not allow to make a reliable temperature reading since the water was going into its vapor phase.
抛物面太阳能集热器中平面螺旋与锥形螺旋热效率的比较研究
比较了抛物面太阳能集热器集中的两种辐射能的热效率。方法:制成两根长1.3 m,直径3/8”的螺旋铜管,从一步控制水流,再循环,测量容器内的水,每5分钟读数一次。这些线圈被放置在直径为77厘米,凹度为6.6厘米的抛物面太阳能集热器的焦点上。两者都能有效地吸收热量并将热量传递给水本身,这显示出更大的热量损失,但它是锥形的,尽管它没有暴露在气流中,而且它有一个铝外壳。与此同时,尽管暴露在气流中,扁平螺旋的温度表现出更大的均匀性。当流速为0.15 l/min时,在30分钟内达到的最高温度为97.5℃。较低的流量不允许做出可靠的温度读数,因为水进入了它的蒸汽相。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信