Regenerative economics for planetary health: A scoping review

Geordan D Shannon, R. Issa, C. Wood, I. Kelman
{"title":"Regenerative economics for planetary health: A scoping review","authors":"Geordan D Shannon, R. Issa, C. Wood, I. Kelman","doi":"10.32920/ihtp.v2i3.1704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The relationship between humans and our planet is conditioned by an economic system that undermines rather than supports health. There has been an emerging focus on the relationship between economic structures and planetary health, but alternative economic approaches to support health for people and the planet require further development. Regenerative economics offers a compelling approach to transform humankind’s relationships with each other and their environment. Regenerative economics fosters grounded, pragmatic solutions to wider human and ecological crises that moves beyond a sustainability discourse towards one of regeneration. While there are, notionally, large areas of overlap between regenerative economics and planetary health, to date these have not been systematically articulated. Methods: A scoping review was performed to examine the background, principles, and applications of regenerative economics, and their implications for planetary health. Five databases (SCOPUS, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Geobase, IEEE Xplore) were searched for peer-reviewed literature using key terms relating to regenerative economics and planetary health. Findings were reported using thematic synthesis. Results: The review identified a total of 121 articles and included 30 papers in the final review, from economics, industrial design, business, tourism, education, urban design and architecture, energy, technology, and food and agriculture. The principles of regenerative economics focused on people, place, planet, position, peace, plurality, and progress. Putting these principles into action requires identifying and valuing different forms of capital, taking a dynamic systems approach, applying regenerative design, developing a true circular economy, good governance, and transdisciplinary education and advocacy. Conclusions: While the principles of regenerative economics and planetary health are well aligned, the tools and actions of each field differ substantially. Planetary health can learn from regenerative economics’ grounding in natural design principles, systems-based approaches, actions at the right scale and cadence, respect for diversity, community and place, and mindset that moves beyond sustainability towards a regenerative future.","PeriodicalId":231465,"journal":{"name":"International Health Trends and Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health Trends and Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32920/ihtp.v2i3.1704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: The relationship between humans and our planet is conditioned by an economic system that undermines rather than supports health. There has been an emerging focus on the relationship between economic structures and planetary health, but alternative economic approaches to support health for people and the planet require further development. Regenerative economics offers a compelling approach to transform humankind’s relationships with each other and their environment. Regenerative economics fosters grounded, pragmatic solutions to wider human and ecological crises that moves beyond a sustainability discourse towards one of regeneration. While there are, notionally, large areas of overlap between regenerative economics and planetary health, to date these have not been systematically articulated. Methods: A scoping review was performed to examine the background, principles, and applications of regenerative economics, and their implications for planetary health. Five databases (SCOPUS, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Geobase, IEEE Xplore) were searched for peer-reviewed literature using key terms relating to regenerative economics and planetary health. Findings were reported using thematic synthesis. Results: The review identified a total of 121 articles and included 30 papers in the final review, from economics, industrial design, business, tourism, education, urban design and architecture, energy, technology, and food and agriculture. The principles of regenerative economics focused on people, place, planet, position, peace, plurality, and progress. Putting these principles into action requires identifying and valuing different forms of capital, taking a dynamic systems approach, applying regenerative design, developing a true circular economy, good governance, and transdisciplinary education and advocacy. Conclusions: While the principles of regenerative economics and planetary health are well aligned, the tools and actions of each field differ substantially. Planetary health can learn from regenerative economics’ grounding in natural design principles, systems-based approaches, actions at the right scale and cadence, respect for diversity, community and place, and mindset that moves beyond sustainability towards a regenerative future.
地球健康的再生经济学:范围审查
导言:人类与我们的星球之间的关系受到损害而不是促进健康的经济制度的制约。经济结构与地球健康之间的关系日益受到重视,但支持人类和地球健康的其他经济办法需要进一步发展。再生经济学提供了一种令人信服的方法来改变人类与彼此以及他们的环境的关系。再生经济学为更广泛的人类和生态危机提供了切实可行的解决方案,超越了可持续发展的话语,转向了再生的话语。虽然在理论上,再生经济和地球健康之间有很大的重叠领域,但迄今为止,这些领域还没有得到系统的阐述。方法:对再生经济学的背景、原理和应用及其对地球健康的影响进行范围审查。五个数据库(SCOPUS, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Geobase, IEEE Xplore)检索了使用再生经济学和地球健康相关关键术语的同行评议文献。使用专题综合方法报告了调查结果。结果:审查共确定了121篇文章,最终审查包括30篇论文,来自经济学,工业设计,商业,旅游,教育,城市设计和建筑,能源,技术以及食品和农业。再生经济的原则侧重于人、地点、星球、地位、和平、多元化和进步。将这些原则付诸行动需要识别和评估不同形式的资本,采用动态系统方法,应用再生设计,发展真正的循环经济,良好的治理,以及跨学科的教育和宣传。结论:虽然再生经济学和地球健康的原则是一致的,但每个领域的工具和行动却有很大不同。地球健康可以借鉴再生经济学的自然设计原则、基于系统的方法、适当规模和节奏的行动、对多样性、社区和地方的尊重,以及超越可持续性走向可再生未来的思维方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信