ACADEMIC AUTONOMY: RESPONSIBILITY OF THE UNIVERSITY FOR THE QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Нalyna Kalinicheva
{"title":"ACADEMIC AUTONOMY: RESPONSIBILITY OF THE UNIVERSITY FOR THE QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION","authors":"Нalyna Kalinicheva","doi":"10.28925/2312-5829.2022.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dynamic changes in socio-political life, European integrative aspirations of Ukraine and the development of a democratic society determined a number of reform changes in the system of national higher education, which affected the spread of academic freedoms and the universities institutional autonomy. The article points out the role of university autonomy and its measuring; the content of academic autonomy is revealed; it is the focused on one of its components – the rating assessment of research and teaching staff professional activities.\n\nThe aim of the article is to determine the role of academic autonomy as a necessary condition for the evaluation of scientific and pedagogical activities of university teachers and justify the importance of such self-esteem in the system of internal quality assurance of higher education.\n\nThe article points out the connection between the rating assessment of scientific and pedagogical staff of the university with its mission, vision and development strategy. It is noted that the rating of the university teachers’ professional activities is a multilevel, integrated and complex process, which aims to study the level of quality assurance in higher education at the university and develop and justify management decisions to improve it.\n\nBased on the comparison of normative documents and open sources on the Internet of Ukrainian universities from different Ukraine regions and universities included in the QS World University Rankings 2022, it was carried out the analysis of the rating assessment the professional activity of research and teaching staff of higher education institutions.\n\nThe analysis of self-assessment methods made it possible to identify both common criteria and approaches, аnd certain specifics in the rating policy of higher education institutions, which indicates the institutional autonomy of Ukrainian universities. Generalization the rating assessment practice of research and teaching staff in higher education institutions of Ukraine provides a key to understanding the existing problems and unused reserves in the internal system and the process of ensuring the quality of higher education.\n\nFurther study the practice of teaching staff professional activities' rating assessment in higher education institutions and taking into account the experience will help to optimize the internal providing system of higher education quality.","PeriodicalId":289326,"journal":{"name":"Educological discourse","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educological discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2022.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dynamic changes in socio-political life, European integrative aspirations of Ukraine and the development of a democratic society determined a number of reform changes in the system of national higher education, which affected the spread of academic freedoms and the universities institutional autonomy. The article points out the role of university autonomy and its measuring; the content of academic autonomy is revealed; it is the focused on one of its components – the rating assessment of research and teaching staff professional activities. The aim of the article is to determine the role of academic autonomy as a necessary condition for the evaluation of scientific and pedagogical activities of university teachers and justify the importance of such self-esteem in the system of internal quality assurance of higher education. The article points out the connection between the rating assessment of scientific and pedagogical staff of the university with its mission, vision and development strategy. It is noted that the rating of the university teachers’ professional activities is a multilevel, integrated and complex process, which aims to study the level of quality assurance in higher education at the university and develop and justify management decisions to improve it. Based on the comparison of normative documents and open sources on the Internet of Ukrainian universities from different Ukraine regions and universities included in the QS World University Rankings 2022, it was carried out the analysis of the rating assessment the professional activity of research and teaching staff of higher education institutions. The analysis of self-assessment methods made it possible to identify both common criteria and approaches, аnd certain specifics in the rating policy of higher education institutions, which indicates the institutional autonomy of Ukrainian universities. Generalization the rating assessment practice of research and teaching staff in higher education institutions of Ukraine provides a key to understanding the existing problems and unused reserves in the internal system and the process of ensuring the quality of higher education. Further study the practice of teaching staff professional activities' rating assessment in higher education institutions and taking into account the experience will help to optimize the internal providing system of higher education quality.
学术自治:大学对高等教育质量的责任
社会政治生活的动态变化、乌克兰融入欧洲的愿望以及民主社会的发展决定了国家高等教育制度的一些改革变化,这些变化影响了学术自由的传播和大学机构自治。文章指出了大学自治的作用及其测度;揭示了学术自主的内涵;它的重点是其组成部分之一-研究和教学人员的专业活动的评级评估。本文的目的是确定学术自主作为评价大学教师科学和教学活动的必要条件的作用,并证明这种自尊在高等教育内部质量保证体系中的重要性。文章指出了高校科教人员等级评定与学校的使命、愿景和发展战略之间的联系。指出大学教师专业活动的评级是一个多层次、综合和复杂的过程,其目的是研究大学高等教育的质量保证水平,并制定和证明管理决策,以改善它。在比较乌克兰不同地区的乌克兰大学和列入QS世界大学排名2022的大学的规范性文件和互联网上的开放资源的基础上,对高等教育机构的研究和教学人员的专业活动进行了评级评估分析。对自我评价方法的分析使我们能够确定共同的标准和方法,以及高等教育机构评级政策中的某些具体情况,这表明乌克兰大学的机构自治。推广乌克兰高等院校科研和教学人员的等级评估实践,是了解内部制度和保证高等教育质量过程中存在的问题和未使用储备的关键。深入研究高等学校教师专业活动等级评估的实践,借鉴经验,有助于优化高等教育质量的内部提供体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信