Effect of Cognitive Biases on Investment Decision Making: A Case of Pokhara Valley, Nepal

Bharat Ram Dhungana, Sandhya Bhandari, Deepak Ojha, L. Sharma
{"title":"Effect of Cognitive Biases on Investment Decision Making: A Case of Pokhara Valley, Nepal","authors":"Bharat Ram Dhungana, Sandhya Bhandari, Deepak Ojha, L. Sharma","doi":"10.3126/qjmss.v4i1.45868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Behavioral finance deals with the study of psychological influences on investors and financial markets. Investors commonly perform investment analysis through fundamental and technical analysis. The behavior of the investment market originates from the principles of psychological decision-making that explains the reasons behind buying and selling stocks.   \nObjectives: This paper aims to examine the effect of cognitive biases on investment decisions in Pokhara Valley, Nepal. The effect of five cognitive biases, such as availability, anchoring, overconfidence, herd instinct, and regret aversion, is measured on rational investment decision-making.  \nMethods: This study is based on primary data sources using non-probability (convenience method) sampling techniques. There are seven brokerage houses in Pokhara valley, and researchers selected 179 respondents involved in stock market investment. Both descriptive and inferential analyses were made to analyze the data.  \nResults: The study discovers a link between irrationality in financial decision-making and availability, overconfidence, and herd instinct biases, but anchoring and regret aversion biases had no effect on irrational investment decisions. However, though all the biases have a positive relationship with an irrational investment decision, overconfidence bias has the highest impact. Regret aversion bias has the least impact on investment decisions in comparison to the other four biases.  \nConclusion: The investors and the policymakers should focus on finding the cognitive biases and various de-biasing methods to eradicate those biases throughout investment decision-making. The findings of this study have a number of implications for investors, brokers, and governments who aim to stimulate stock market investment.","PeriodicalId":383816,"journal":{"name":"Quest Journal of Management and Social Sciences","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quest Journal of Management and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/qjmss.v4i1.45868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Behavioral finance deals with the study of psychological influences on investors and financial markets. Investors commonly perform investment analysis through fundamental and technical analysis. The behavior of the investment market originates from the principles of psychological decision-making that explains the reasons behind buying and selling stocks.   Objectives: This paper aims to examine the effect of cognitive biases on investment decisions in Pokhara Valley, Nepal. The effect of five cognitive biases, such as availability, anchoring, overconfidence, herd instinct, and regret aversion, is measured on rational investment decision-making.  Methods: This study is based on primary data sources using non-probability (convenience method) sampling techniques. There are seven brokerage houses in Pokhara valley, and researchers selected 179 respondents involved in stock market investment. Both descriptive and inferential analyses were made to analyze the data.  Results: The study discovers a link between irrationality in financial decision-making and availability, overconfidence, and herd instinct biases, but anchoring and regret aversion biases had no effect on irrational investment decisions. However, though all the biases have a positive relationship with an irrational investment decision, overconfidence bias has the highest impact. Regret aversion bias has the least impact on investment decisions in comparison to the other four biases.  Conclusion: The investors and the policymakers should focus on finding the cognitive biases and various de-biasing methods to eradicate those biases throughout investment decision-making. The findings of this study have a number of implications for investors, brokers, and governments who aim to stimulate stock market investment.
认知偏差对投资决策的影响:以尼泊尔博卡拉山谷为例
背景:行为金融学研究对投资者和金融市场的心理影响。投资者通常通过基本面分析和技术分析进行投资分析。投资市场的行为源于解释买卖股票背后原因的心理决策原则。目的:本文旨在研究认知偏差对尼泊尔博卡拉山谷投资决策的影响。五种认知偏差,如可用性、锚定、过度自信、羊群本能和后悔厌恶,对理性投资决策的影响进行了测量。方法:本研究基于原始数据来源,采用非概率(方便方法)抽样技术。博卡拉山谷共有7家经纪公司,研究人员选择了179名参与股市投资的受访者。采用描述性分析和推理分析两种方法对数据进行分析。结果:研究发现财务决策的非理性与可得性、过度自信和羊群本能偏差之间存在联系,但锚定和后悔厌恶偏差对非理性投资决策没有影响。然而,尽管所有偏差都与非理性投资决策呈正相关,但过度自信偏差的影响最大。与其他四种偏见相比,后悔厌恶偏见对投资决策的影响最小。结论:投资者和决策者应注重发现认知偏差,并采取各种消除偏差的方法,在投资决策过程中消除这些偏差。这项研究的发现对旨在刺激股市投资的投资者、经纪人和政府有许多启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信