DEMOCRACY AND ELECTORAL VIOLENCE IN MALAWI: THE POST-2019 ELECTIONS

M. Hussein, G. Sambo
{"title":"DEMOCRACY AND ELECTORAL VIOLENCE IN MALAWI: THE POST-2019 ELECTIONS","authors":"M. Hussein, G. Sambo","doi":"10.55190/fubt8354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article holds that regular, free, fair, and credible elections is a litmus test for determining democratic government legitimacy; however, electoral violence has persisted. Whereas regular elections ensure that government draws its legitimacy from the will of the voters, and whereas they are an indispensable element of democratic governance, they do not guarantee that the exercise of government and political power would be democratically pluralistic. This article examines the factors behind electoral violence in Malawi; and it argues that although regular elections are institutional pillars of liberal democracy, their political contestations often degenerate into violence. Electoral violence has characterised most elections in African states, including Malawi. The article finds that deficiency of democratic norms, inappropriate electoral systems and weak Electoral Management Bodies are some of the key motives underlying post-electoral violence in Malawi. The article concludes that pragmatic polices which create a conducive environment for free, fair, credible, and peaceful elections are required to sustain electoral democracy. It recommends that attention should be given to political-legal and socio-economic institutions as well as efficient and effective management of entire electoral process in order to provide level political field among parties, minimize electoral violence and consolidate democracy. Keywords: Democracy consolidation, Elections, Electoral administration, Electoral violence","PeriodicalId":179506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55190/fubt8354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article holds that regular, free, fair, and credible elections is a litmus test for determining democratic government legitimacy; however, electoral violence has persisted. Whereas regular elections ensure that government draws its legitimacy from the will of the voters, and whereas they are an indispensable element of democratic governance, they do not guarantee that the exercise of government and political power would be democratically pluralistic. This article examines the factors behind electoral violence in Malawi; and it argues that although regular elections are institutional pillars of liberal democracy, their political contestations often degenerate into violence. Electoral violence has characterised most elections in African states, including Malawi. The article finds that deficiency of democratic norms, inappropriate electoral systems and weak Electoral Management Bodies are some of the key motives underlying post-electoral violence in Malawi. The article concludes that pragmatic polices which create a conducive environment for free, fair, credible, and peaceful elections are required to sustain electoral democracy. It recommends that attention should be given to political-legal and socio-economic institutions as well as efficient and effective management of entire electoral process in order to provide level political field among parties, minimize electoral violence and consolidate democracy. Keywords: Democracy consolidation, Elections, Electoral administration, Electoral violence
马拉维的民主和选举暴力:2019年后的选举
本文认为,定期、自由、公平和可信的选举是检验民主政府合法性的试金石;然而,选举暴力仍在继续。虽然定期选举确保政府从选民的意愿中获得合法性,虽然它们是民主治理的一个不可或缺的因素,但它们并不能保证政府和政治权力的行使将是民主多元化的。本文考察了马拉维选举暴力背后的因素;它还认为,尽管定期选举是自由民主的制度支柱,但它们的政治竞争往往会演变成暴力。选举暴力是包括马拉维在内的大多数非洲国家选举的特点。文章发现,缺乏民主规范、不适当的选举制度和薄弱的选举管理机构是马拉维选举后暴力的一些主要动机。文章的结论是,为自由、公平、可信和和平的选举创造有利环境的务实政策是维持选举民主所必需的。委员会建议应注意政治、法律和社会经济机构以及对整个选举过程的高效率和有效管理,以便在各党派之间提供公平的政治场所,尽量减少选举暴力和巩固民主。关键词:巩固民主,选举,选举管理,选举暴力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信