Parametric and Non-Parametric Cost Efficiency Benchmarking of Water Utilities in Russia

I. Dolmatov, V. Dvorkin, Igor V. Maskaev
{"title":"Parametric and Non-Parametric Cost Efficiency Benchmarking of Water Utilities in Russia","authors":"I. Dolmatov, V. Dvorkin, Igor V. Maskaev","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2698129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The activities of the water companies in Russia are regulated in order to overcome market failures caused by regional monopolization, information asymmetries and the need to find a balance between the interests of consumers and company objectives for its normal functioning and development. In the Russian Federation, the regulator uses the outdated and inefficient cost method, which deprives the company an incentive to reduce their own costs. However, Russian regulator is in active discussion about the transition to modern long-term management regulation practices in order to increase companies’ efficiency, which in the framework of the regulation defines the future of the company's profits. Russian regulator should take more active steps to encourage regulated companies to increase efficiency and productivity. Solution is to move to using benchmarking, which allows to identify sources of companies’ inefficiency to assess the validity of the established tariffs. This study presents the first attempt to implement benchmarking methods used by the world's leading regulators to determine the cost efficiency of companies and improve their potential. The authors tested a parametric (COLS) and non-parametric (DEA) methods to assess the performance of companies with different technical and economic characteristics more accurately. The study makes a number of recommendations for the specification of the model, assessing its sensitivity to the changes in samples. The authors concluded that the model based on COLS is of high quality and resistance to changing of sample while assessing the technical efficiency. However, a similar statement for DEA models is unfair, since the inclusion in the analysis of either too large or too small companies does not lead to plausible results. On the other hand, DEA allowed to assess not only the technical efficiency of companies but also the allocative one. In general, the authors have shown that the potential for increasing the efficiency of Russian water supply companies is large enough, and the regulator is necessary to accelerate the transition to incentive regulation in order to increase efficiency in the sector.","PeriodicalId":403142,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Agriculture","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2698129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The activities of the water companies in Russia are regulated in order to overcome market failures caused by regional monopolization, information asymmetries and the need to find a balance between the interests of consumers and company objectives for its normal functioning and development. In the Russian Federation, the regulator uses the outdated and inefficient cost method, which deprives the company an incentive to reduce their own costs. However, Russian regulator is in active discussion about the transition to modern long-term management regulation practices in order to increase companies’ efficiency, which in the framework of the regulation defines the future of the company's profits. Russian regulator should take more active steps to encourage regulated companies to increase efficiency and productivity. Solution is to move to using benchmarking, which allows to identify sources of companies’ inefficiency to assess the validity of the established tariffs. This study presents the first attempt to implement benchmarking methods used by the world's leading regulators to determine the cost efficiency of companies and improve their potential. The authors tested a parametric (COLS) and non-parametric (DEA) methods to assess the performance of companies with different technical and economic characteristics more accurately. The study makes a number of recommendations for the specification of the model, assessing its sensitivity to the changes in samples. The authors concluded that the model based on COLS is of high quality and resistance to changing of sample while assessing the technical efficiency. However, a similar statement for DEA models is unfair, since the inclusion in the analysis of either too large or too small companies does not lead to plausible results. On the other hand, DEA allowed to assess not only the technical efficiency of companies but also the allocative one. In general, the authors have shown that the potential for increasing the efficiency of Russian water supply companies is large enough, and the regulator is necessary to accelerate the transition to incentive regulation in order to increase efficiency in the sector.
俄罗斯水务公司的参数和非参数成本效率基准
俄罗斯自来水公司的活动受到管制,以克服由于区域垄断、信息不对称和需要在消费者的利益和公司的正常运作和发展目标之间找到平衡而造成的市场失灵。在俄罗斯联邦,监管机构使用过时且效率低下的成本法,这剥夺了公司降低自身成本的动力。然而,俄罗斯监管机构正在积极讨论向现代长期管理监管实践的过渡,以提高公司的效率,这在监管框架内决定了公司利润的未来。俄罗斯监管机构应采取更积极的措施,鼓励受监管企业提高效率和生产率。解决方案是转向使用基准,这可以确定公司效率低下的根源,以评估既定关税的有效性。本研究首次尝试实施世界主要监管机构使用的基准方法,以确定公司的成本效率并提高其潜力。本文采用参数化(COLS)和非参数化(DEA)方法对具有不同技术经济特征的企业绩效进行了较为准确的评价。该研究对模型的规格提出了一些建议,评估了其对样本变化的敏感性。在评估技术效率的同时,得出基于COLS的模型质量高、耐样品变化的结论。然而,对DEA模型的类似陈述是不公平的,因为在分析中包括太大或太小的公司都不会导致可信的结果。另一方面,DEA不仅可以评估企业的技术效率,还可以评估企业的配置效率。总的来说,作者已经表明,提高俄罗斯供水公司效率的潜力足够大,监管者有必要加快向激励监管的过渡,以提高该部门的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信