E. M. Sembiring, F. Simanjuntak, Karana Jaya Tarigan, Veracy Silalahi
{"title":"Politeness in the EFL Classroom Interaction: Strategies in Avoiding Face Threatening Act (FTA)","authors":"E. M. Sembiring, F. Simanjuntak, Karana Jaya Tarigan, Veracy Silalahi","doi":"10.52622/jcar.v1i2.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to look into how lecturers from Methodist University's Letters Faculty express politeness in their words and actions during the learning process in classroom interaction. Observing lecturers and students of various ethnicities, religions, and cultures, one must be understanding and well-managed in order to avoid the face threatening act and retain the diversity among them. The study was conducted at the Letters Faculty's classes at The Methodist University of Indonesia. The researchers took a qualitative approach to the study, monitoring lecturers’ activities with students in classroom interaction and recording their communication during the process of learning. The lecturers used the three types of politeness strategies to respond to the context of avoiding conflict and maintaining harmony, as evidenced by the results. Bald On-record politeness strategy, positive politeness strategy, and negative politeness strategy are the three types of the strategies. The bald on record strategy is the most commonly employed of the three types of politeness strategies used by the lecturers. It's because the lecturers are having more power in the class. Lecturers have right to ask students without asking the students first. Surprisingly, lecturers are not shy to say sorry and thank you even they have more power in the class. In short, lecturers try to avoid the face threatening acts by this way of communication. Unluckly, the result of the study also presents the act of some lecturers who were sitting in student’s table during the learning process. Thus, it creates discomfort for students.","PeriodicalId":364379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Classroom Action Research","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Classroom Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52622/jcar.v1i2.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to look into how lecturers from Methodist University's Letters Faculty express politeness in their words and actions during the learning process in classroom interaction. Observing lecturers and students of various ethnicities, religions, and cultures, one must be understanding and well-managed in order to avoid the face threatening act and retain the diversity among them. The study was conducted at the Letters Faculty's classes at The Methodist University of Indonesia. The researchers took a qualitative approach to the study, monitoring lecturers’ activities with students in classroom interaction and recording their communication during the process of learning. The lecturers used the three types of politeness strategies to respond to the context of avoiding conflict and maintaining harmony, as evidenced by the results. Bald On-record politeness strategy, positive politeness strategy, and negative politeness strategy are the three types of the strategies. The bald on record strategy is the most commonly employed of the three types of politeness strategies used by the lecturers. It's because the lecturers are having more power in the class. Lecturers have right to ask students without asking the students first. Surprisingly, lecturers are not shy to say sorry and thank you even they have more power in the class. In short, lecturers try to avoid the face threatening acts by this way of communication. Unluckly, the result of the study also presents the act of some lecturers who were sitting in student’s table during the learning process. Thus, it creates discomfort for students.
本研究旨在探讨卫理公会大学文学系讲师在课堂互动学习过程中,如何以言行表达礼貌。观察不同种族、宗教和文化的讲师和学生,必须理解和管理好,以避免面对威胁行为,保持他们之间的多样性。这项研究是在印尼卫理公会大学(The Methodist University of Indonesia)文学院的课堂上进行的。研究人员采用定性方法进行研究,监测教师在课堂上与学生互动的活动,并记录他们在学习过程中的交流。结果表明,讲师使用这三种礼貌策略来应对避免冲突和保持和谐的语境。正式礼貌策略、积极礼貌策略和消极礼貌策略是正式礼貌策略的三种类型。在演讲者使用的三种礼貌策略中,最常使用的是“记录策略”。这是因为讲师在课堂上有更大的权力。教师有权不问学生,而直接向学生提问。令人惊讶的是,即使讲师在课堂上拥有更多的权力,他们也不会羞于说对不起和谢谢。简而言之,演讲者试图通过这种沟通方式避免面对威胁行为。不幸的是,研究结果也呈现了一些在学习过程中坐在学生桌子上的讲师的行为。因此,它给学生带来了不适。