Drug-Associated Delirium Identified in The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System

Adrian Wong, Angela Li, Kane-Gill, M. Gray, Pamela L. Smithburger, S. Choi
{"title":"Drug-Associated Delirium Identified in The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System","authors":"Adrian Wong, Angela Li, Kane-Gill, M. Gray, Pamela L. Smithburger, S. Choi","doi":"10.31487/J.PDR.2019.03.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Drug toxicity and polypharmacy are major risk factors for delirium, especially in older adult patients with underlying comorbidities. However, numerous case reports have described drugs with a lower suspicion of being deliriogenic. The objective of this study was to identify deliriogenic drugs in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) to broaden the public knowledge and understanding.\nStudy Design: Retrospective pharmacovigilance evaluation. \nMethods: FAERS reports from 2004 through 2015 were reviewed for delirium-associated terms, which were utilized to identify drugs most frequently reported to cause delirium. Drugs were categorized as: 1) known to be deliriogenic; 2) potentially deliriogenic; or 3) new potential to be deliriogenic. The 100 most frequently reported drugs were analyzed in reporting odds ratios (ROR). \nResults: Of the known deliriogenic drugs (n=32), paroxetine (ROR 4.1, CI 4.0-4.3), olanzapine (ROR 3.3, CI 3.2-3.4), and clozapine (ROR 2.9, CI 2.8-3.0) were most reported. Of the potentially deliriogenic drugs (n=54), duloxetine (ROR 3.2, CI 3.1-3.3), varenicline (ROR 3.1, CI 3.0-3.2), and gabapentin (ROR 2.9, CI 2.7-3.0) were most reported. Three drugs were considered to have new potential to be deliriogenic: heparin (ROR 1.5, CI 1.4-1.6), metformin (ROR 1.3, CI 1.3-1.4), and dalfampridine (ROR 1.1, CI 1.1-1.2).\nConclusion: The majority of drugs were considered potentially deliriogenic. FAERS can provide post-marketing surveillance data to guide future studies on potentially deliriogenic drugs to guide management of causal agents.","PeriodicalId":124933,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Disorders and Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Disorders and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/J.PDR.2019.03.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Drug toxicity and polypharmacy are major risk factors for delirium, especially in older adult patients with underlying comorbidities. However, numerous case reports have described drugs with a lower suspicion of being deliriogenic. The objective of this study was to identify deliriogenic drugs in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) to broaden the public knowledge and understanding. Study Design: Retrospective pharmacovigilance evaluation. Methods: FAERS reports from 2004 through 2015 were reviewed for delirium-associated terms, which were utilized to identify drugs most frequently reported to cause delirium. Drugs were categorized as: 1) known to be deliriogenic; 2) potentially deliriogenic; or 3) new potential to be deliriogenic. The 100 most frequently reported drugs were analyzed in reporting odds ratios (ROR). Results: Of the known deliriogenic drugs (n=32), paroxetine (ROR 4.1, CI 4.0-4.3), olanzapine (ROR 3.3, CI 3.2-3.4), and clozapine (ROR 2.9, CI 2.8-3.0) were most reported. Of the potentially deliriogenic drugs (n=54), duloxetine (ROR 3.2, CI 3.1-3.3), varenicline (ROR 3.1, CI 3.0-3.2), and gabapentin (ROR 2.9, CI 2.7-3.0) were most reported. Three drugs were considered to have new potential to be deliriogenic: heparin (ROR 1.5, CI 1.4-1.6), metformin (ROR 1.3, CI 1.3-1.4), and dalfampridine (ROR 1.1, CI 1.1-1.2). Conclusion: The majority of drugs were considered potentially deliriogenic. FAERS can provide post-marketing surveillance data to guide future studies on potentially deliriogenic drugs to guide management of causal agents.
食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统中发现的药物相关性谵妄
药物毒性和多药是谵妄的主要危险因素,特别是在有潜在合并症的老年患者中。然而,许多病例报告都描述了药物引起谵妄的可能性较低。本研究的目的是在美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中确定致痫药物,以扩大公众的认识和理解。研究设计:回顾性药物警戒性评价。方法:回顾2004年至2015年FAERS报告中的谵妄相关术语,这些术语用于识别最常报告引起谵妄的药物。药物分为:1)已知的谵妄药物;2)可能致谵妄;或者3)有制造谵妄的新潜力。对100种最常报告的药物进行报告优势比(ROR)分析。结果:已知致痫药物(n=32)中,以帕罗西汀(ROR 4.1, CI 4.0 ~ 4.3)、奥氮平(ROR 3.3, CI 3.2 ~ 3.4)、氯氮平(ROR 2.9, CI 2.8 ~ 3.0)报道最多。潜在致痫药物(n=54)中,度洛西汀(ROR 3.2, CI 3.1-3.3)、伐尼克林(ROR 3.1, CI 3.0-3.2)和加巴喷丁(ROR 2.9, CI 2.7-3.0)报道最多。有三种药物被认为具有新的致deligenic潜力:肝素(ROR 1.5, CI 1.4-1.6),二甲双胍(ROR 1.3, CI 1.3-1.4)和达福普定(ROR 1.1, CI 1.1-1.2)。结论:大多数药物被认为具有潜在的谵妄性。FAERS可提供上市后监测数据,指导未来潜在致孕药物的研究,指导致病因子的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信