Influence of Tillage and Mulching Systems on Soil Water and Tomato Fruit Yield and Quality

J. A. Swenson, S. Walters, S. Chong
{"title":"Influence of Tillage and Mulching Systems on Soil Water and Tomato Fruit Yield and Quality","authors":"J. A. Swenson, S. Walters, S. Chong","doi":"10.1300/J068v10n01_09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many growers have interests in using mulches, cover crops, and conservation tillage systems in tomato production, but also have concerns about the effect of soil moisture fluctuations on fruit quality. Percent soil moisture and ‘Fabulous’ tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit production in response to different mulching/tillage systems within wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and winter rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crops were evaluated. Treatments applied following the mowing of the cover crops were: (1) conventional tillage (CT); (2) black polyethylene plastic over conventional tillage (BP); (3) no-tillage with cover crop killed with 1.5% glyphosate one week prior to transplanting (NT); (4) strip-tillage with cover crop killed with a 1.5% glyphosate one week prior to transplanting (ST); (5) no-tillage in which the cover crop was mowed periodically during the growing season [NT-Lm (living mulch)]; and (6) strip-tillage with the cover crop mowed and treated similar to treatment 5 (ST-Lm). Generally, there were no differences (P < 0.05) between winter rye and wheat cover crops with respect to tomato quality or yields. Large amounts of cull fruit were produced in both years, regardless of moisture; however, blossom-end rot was more severe across treatments during 1999. Under drought conditions (1999 growing season), all conservation tillage treatments had higher soil moisture readings 24 hrs after rainfall than other treatments, but BP had higher moisture levels than all other treatments under times of excessive water depletion. Under a condition of sufficient soil moisture (2000 growing season), black plastic resulted in higher soil moisture early in the season than CT or conservation tillage systems, a response associated with greater total marketable yields. Comparisons between the various conservation tillage treatments for soil moisture and tomato yields were inconclusive, but with adequate and consistent soil moisture, conservation and conventional tillage treatments produced similar marketable yields.","PeriodicalId":169819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J068v10n01_09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many growers have interests in using mulches, cover crops, and conservation tillage systems in tomato production, but also have concerns about the effect of soil moisture fluctuations on fruit quality. Percent soil moisture and ‘Fabulous’ tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit production in response to different mulching/tillage systems within wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and winter rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crops were evaluated. Treatments applied following the mowing of the cover crops were: (1) conventional tillage (CT); (2) black polyethylene plastic over conventional tillage (BP); (3) no-tillage with cover crop killed with 1.5% glyphosate one week prior to transplanting (NT); (4) strip-tillage with cover crop killed with a 1.5% glyphosate one week prior to transplanting (ST); (5) no-tillage in which the cover crop was mowed periodically during the growing season [NT-Lm (living mulch)]; and (6) strip-tillage with the cover crop mowed and treated similar to treatment 5 (ST-Lm). Generally, there were no differences (P < 0.05) between winter rye and wheat cover crops with respect to tomato quality or yields. Large amounts of cull fruit were produced in both years, regardless of moisture; however, blossom-end rot was more severe across treatments during 1999. Under drought conditions (1999 growing season), all conservation tillage treatments had higher soil moisture readings 24 hrs after rainfall than other treatments, but BP had higher moisture levels than all other treatments under times of excessive water depletion. Under a condition of sufficient soil moisture (2000 growing season), black plastic resulted in higher soil moisture early in the season than CT or conservation tillage systems, a response associated with greater total marketable yields. Comparisons between the various conservation tillage treatments for soil moisture and tomato yields were inconclusive, but with adequate and consistent soil moisture, conservation and conventional tillage treatments produced similar marketable yields.
耕覆制度对土壤水分和番茄产量品质的影响
许多种植者对在番茄生产中使用地膜、覆盖作物和保护性耕作系统感兴趣,但也担心土壤湿度波动对果实品质的影响。研究了不同覆盖/耕作制度对小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)和冬黑麦(Secale cereale L.)覆盖作物土壤含水量和“超级”番茄(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)果实产量的影响。覆盖作物刈割后的处理:(1)常规耕作(CT);(2)黑色聚乙烯塑料常规耕作(BP);(3)免耕,移栽前一周用1.5%草甘膦杀死覆盖作物(NT);(4)条带耕作,在移栽前一周用1.5%草甘膦杀死覆盖作物;(5)在生长季节定期刈割覆盖作物的免耕[NT-Lm(活膜)];(6)覆盖作物刈割后的条带耕作,处理方法与处理5 (ST-Lm)相似。总体而言,冬黑麦与小麦覆盖作物在番茄品质和产量方面无显著差异(P < 0.05)。无论湿度如何,这两年都产出了大量的果实;然而,1999年不同处理的花端腐病更为严重。在干旱条件下(1999年生长期),所有保护性耕作处理在降雨后24 h的土壤水分读数都高于其他处理,但在过度缺水的情况下,BP的土壤水分水平高于所有其他处理。在土壤水分充足的条件下(2000年生长季节),黑塑料在季节早期比CT或保护性耕作系统产生更高的土壤水分,这一反应与更高的总可销售产量有关。各种保护性耕作处理对土壤水分和番茄产量的影响没有定论,但在土壤水分充足和一致的情况下,保护性耕作处理和常规耕作处理的可销售产量相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信