Evaluating Degrees of “Softness” in Therapeutic Systems of Knitted Wearable Technology with Brain Injury Survivors

Laura J Salisbury
{"title":"Evaluating Degrees of “Softness” in Therapeutic Systems of Knitted Wearable Technology with Brain Injury Survivors","authors":"Laura J Salisbury","doi":"10.1080/20511787.2021.1935111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Wearable energy harvesting methods have been increasingly researched over the past decade. Due to demands for finding suitable ways of powering wearable devices suited to garment contexts, yarn-based “components” gather increasing interest. However, the focus of textile properties of energy harvesting components often place emphasis on functional performance and limited elements concerning wearability; using terms such as “flexible”, “breathable” and “wearable”. Rarely, is there consideration for degrees of “comfort”, and “softness”. Yet, if such methods are to become integrated into wearable garments and worn on a daily basis, or even in niche contexts, the tactile experience requires attention. To address this, the following research details an exploration of softness of a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) yarn-based energy harvesting method, amongst brain injury survivors where degrees of sensitivity can vary to extremes; accruing either reduced or heightened levels of sensitivity as a result of stroke, for example. Levels of softness have been defined and quantified from earlier samples responded to by stroke survivors. This has been formed into a chart and used in reference within the development process to refine and detail the methods used to improve the quality of softness in the process of knitting. In contexts, such as the knit lab, participant presence can be limited, yet feedback, especially on subjective matters such as softness, is critical to the development process. The method presented of grading softness in accordance with previous samples is seen to aid the researcher to analyse samples made in situ, within an iterative process of development. The paper focuses on providing conversations around technical data within the knit process to deliver soft and wearable energy harvesting textiles. This forms a part of a wider body of PhD research that explores the use of piezoelectric theory as a technological tool for recovery of upper limb deficits for stroke survivors.","PeriodicalId":275893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2021.1935111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Wearable energy harvesting methods have been increasingly researched over the past decade. Due to demands for finding suitable ways of powering wearable devices suited to garment contexts, yarn-based “components” gather increasing interest. However, the focus of textile properties of energy harvesting components often place emphasis on functional performance and limited elements concerning wearability; using terms such as “flexible”, “breathable” and “wearable”. Rarely, is there consideration for degrees of “comfort”, and “softness”. Yet, if such methods are to become integrated into wearable garments and worn on a daily basis, or even in niche contexts, the tactile experience requires attention. To address this, the following research details an exploration of softness of a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) yarn-based energy harvesting method, amongst brain injury survivors where degrees of sensitivity can vary to extremes; accruing either reduced or heightened levels of sensitivity as a result of stroke, for example. Levels of softness have been defined and quantified from earlier samples responded to by stroke survivors. This has been formed into a chart and used in reference within the development process to refine and detail the methods used to improve the quality of softness in the process of knitting. In contexts, such as the knit lab, participant presence can be limited, yet feedback, especially on subjective matters such as softness, is critical to the development process. The method presented of grading softness in accordance with previous samples is seen to aid the researcher to analyse samples made in situ, within an iterative process of development. The paper focuses on providing conversations around technical data within the knit process to deliver soft and wearable energy harvesting textiles. This forms a part of a wider body of PhD research that explores the use of piezoelectric theory as a technological tool for recovery of upper limb deficits for stroke survivors.
评估针织可穿戴技术治疗系统对脑损伤幸存者的“柔软度”
在过去的十年中,可穿戴能量收集方法得到了越来越多的研究。由于需要找到适合服装环境的可穿戴设备的合适方式,基于纱线的“组件”引起了越来越多的兴趣。然而,能量收集组件的纺织性能的重点往往放在功能性能和有限的元素有关的可穿戴性;使用“灵活”、“透气”和“可穿戴”等术语。很少考虑“舒适”和“柔软”的程度。然而,如果要将这些方法整合到可穿戴服装中,并在日常生活中穿着,甚至在小众环境中穿着,触觉体验就需要引起人们的注意。为了解决这一问题,以下研究详细探讨了基于聚偏氟乙烯(PVDF)纱线的能量收集方法的柔软度,在脑损伤幸存者中,敏感程度可能会变化到极端;例如,由于中风导致的敏感性水平降低或提高。从中风幸存者对早期样本的反应中,对柔软程度进行了定义和量化。这已经形成了一个图表,并在开发过程中用作参考,以完善和详细说明在编织过程中用于提高柔软质量的方法。在像针织实验室这样的环境中,参与者的存在可能是有限的,但是反馈,特别是关于柔软度等主观问题的反馈,对开发过程至关重要。根据以前的样品提出的分级柔软度的方法被认为是为了帮助研究人员分析原位制作的样品,在开发的迭代过程中。本文的重点是围绕编织过程中的技术数据提供对话,以提供柔软和可穿戴的能量收集纺织品。这是一个更广泛的博士研究的一部分,该研究探索了压电理论作为中风幸存者上肢缺陷恢复的技术工具的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信