Kneeling Before the Altar of (Il)-Liberalism: The Politics of Ideas, Job Loss, and Union Weakness in East Central Europe

P. Vanhuysse
{"title":"Kneeling Before the Altar of (Il)-Liberalism: The Politics of Ideas, Job Loss, and Union Weakness in East Central Europe","authors":"P. Vanhuysse","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1019235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the politics of ideas, jobs, and anger in post-communist Europe and it critically reviews Phineas Baxandall's (2004) Constructing Unemployment, and David Ost's (2005) The Defeat of Solidarity. It argues that as the new democracies in Central Europe approach the end of their second decade after communism, they have entered a second stage in the political dynamics of economic reforms. Unemployment and labor anger more generally have clearly not disappeared from the political scene in this stage. But, paradoxically, at a time when liberal forces were on the rise among erstwhile post-communist 'transition laggards' such as Georgia, Ukraine, and Croatia, many first-stage 'transition leaders' have experienced a turn in distinctly illiberal directions. Post-communism's economically liberal elites have achieved remarkable successes - peaceful democratic consolidation, fast market reforms, and EU membership. But they have paid a high price, in the form of lost voters (as politicians) and lost members (as union leaders). The silencing of organized labor and angry workers has accelerated the instauration of neo-liberal varieties of market capitalism and has contributed to fast-growing socio-economic inequalities. At the same time, the uninterrupted functioning of procedural democracy, with peaceful alternations of rival parties in government, now increasingly co-evolves with a decreasing quality of liberal democracy, as new parties have started to mobilize the anger of transition losers along illiberal political platforms.","PeriodicalId":147704,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Political Institutions & Economic Growth (Topic)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Political Institutions & Economic Growth (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1019235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article discusses the politics of ideas, jobs, and anger in post-communist Europe and it critically reviews Phineas Baxandall's (2004) Constructing Unemployment, and David Ost's (2005) The Defeat of Solidarity. It argues that as the new democracies in Central Europe approach the end of their second decade after communism, they have entered a second stage in the political dynamics of economic reforms. Unemployment and labor anger more generally have clearly not disappeared from the political scene in this stage. But, paradoxically, at a time when liberal forces were on the rise among erstwhile post-communist 'transition laggards' such as Georgia, Ukraine, and Croatia, many first-stage 'transition leaders' have experienced a turn in distinctly illiberal directions. Post-communism's economically liberal elites have achieved remarkable successes - peaceful democratic consolidation, fast market reforms, and EU membership. But they have paid a high price, in the form of lost voters (as politicians) and lost members (as union leaders). The silencing of organized labor and angry workers has accelerated the instauration of neo-liberal varieties of market capitalism and has contributed to fast-growing socio-economic inequalities. At the same time, the uninterrupted functioning of procedural democracy, with peaceful alternations of rival parties in government, now increasingly co-evolves with a decreasing quality of liberal democracy, as new parties have started to mobilize the anger of transition losers along illiberal political platforms.
跪在自由主义的圣坛前:中欧东部的思想政治、失业和工会衰弱
本文讨论了后共产主义欧洲的思想、就业和愤怒的政治,并批判性地回顾了菲尼亚斯·巴克斯德尔(2004年)的《构建失业》和大卫·奥斯特(2005年)的《团结的失败》。它认为,随着中欧新兴民主国家在共产主义结束后的第二个十年接近尾声,它们已进入经济改革的政治动态的第二个阶段。在这个阶段,失业和劳工的愤怒显然还没有从政治舞台上消失。但是,矛盾的是,当自由主义力量在格鲁吉亚、乌克兰和克罗地亚等前后共产主义“转型落后国家”中崛起时,许多第一阶段的“转型领导人”经历了明显的非自由主义方向的转变。后共产主义时代的经济自由主义精英取得了显著的成功——和平的民主巩固、快速的市场改革以及加入欧盟。但他们付出了高昂的代价,失去了选民(作为政治家)和成员(作为工会领袖)。有组织的劳工和愤怒的工人的沉默加速了新自由主义市场资本主义的建立,并导致了快速增长的社会经济不平等。与此同时,程序性民主的不间断运作,以及敌对政党在政府中的和平交替,现在越来越多地与自由民主的质量下降共同发展,因为新的政党已经开始在非自由的政治平台上动员过渡失败者的愤怒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信