Improved methods for sizing metal loss in dents for ECA

R. Dotson, Fernando Curiel, L. Sacramento, Zach Locks, Jacob Duska
{"title":"Improved methods for sizing metal loss in dents for ECA","authors":"R. Dotson, Fernando Curiel, L. Sacramento, Zach Locks, Jacob Duska","doi":"10.28999/2514-541X-2020-4-2-126-136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dents interacting with metal loss remain as a significant challenge to operators. Existing regulations require that dents with metal loss within high consequence areas be treated as immediate repairs or 60-day conditions, resulting in costly excavations for many operators. At the time when these regulations were written, it was not clear whether inline inspection technologies could discriminate the nature of the metal loss (i.e. corrosion or mechanical damage) or provide accurate sizing. Furthermore, advanced analysis techniques such as finite element analysis were limited, and fitness- forservice evaluations were not common. While the technological hurdles involved with evaluating interacting dent and metal loss features have been overcome, sensor lift-off remains a challenging issue for magnetic flux leakage (MFL) inspection tools, as sizing accuracy degrades at larger lift-off distances. Until recently, the sensor lift-off issue limited the ability to perform fitness- for- service evaluations because the metal loss in dent features could not be confidently sized. This study demonstrates how integrated lift-off sensors can be used to quantify the lift-off as the MFL sensors pass over a dent. This technology integration has allowed the confident application of sizing specifications for many dents with metal loss, thereby permitting robust fitness- for- service evaluations. Several case studies are examined in this paper, demonstrating how the integrated MFL and lift-off technology can serve to reduce excavations while still ensuring safe pipeline operations.","PeriodicalId":262860,"journal":{"name":"Pipeline Science and Technology","volume":"208 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pipeline Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28999/2514-541X-2020-4-2-126-136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dents interacting with metal loss remain as a significant challenge to operators. Existing regulations require that dents with metal loss within high consequence areas be treated as immediate repairs or 60-day conditions, resulting in costly excavations for many operators. At the time when these regulations were written, it was not clear whether inline inspection technologies could discriminate the nature of the metal loss (i.e. corrosion or mechanical damage) or provide accurate sizing. Furthermore, advanced analysis techniques such as finite element analysis were limited, and fitness- forservice evaluations were not common. While the technological hurdles involved with evaluating interacting dent and metal loss features have been overcome, sensor lift-off remains a challenging issue for magnetic flux leakage (MFL) inspection tools, as sizing accuracy degrades at larger lift-off distances. Until recently, the sensor lift-off issue limited the ability to perform fitness- for- service evaluations because the metal loss in dent features could not be confidently sized. This study demonstrates how integrated lift-off sensors can be used to quantify the lift-off as the MFL sensors pass over a dent. This technology integration has allowed the confident application of sizing specifications for many dents with metal loss, thereby permitting robust fitness- for- service evaluations. Several case studies are examined in this paper, demonstrating how the integrated MFL and lift-off technology can serve to reduce excavations while still ensuring safe pipeline operations.
改进的ECA凹痕金属损失评定方法
凹痕与金属损失的相互作用仍然是运营商面临的重大挑战。现有法规要求,在高危害区域内出现金属损失的凹痕需要立即修复或60天修复,这给许多运营商带来了昂贵的挖掘费用。在编写这些法规时,尚不清楚在线检测技术是否可以区分金属损失的性质(即腐蚀或机械损伤)或提供准确的尺寸。此外,先进的分析技术,如有限元分析是有限的,适合服务的评估并不常见。虽然已经克服了评估相互作用凹痕和金属损耗特征的技术障碍,但对于漏磁(MFL)检测工具来说,传感器升空仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题,因为较大的升空距离会降低尺寸精度。直到最近,由于无法确定凹痕特征中金属损失的大小,传感器升空问题限制了进行适用性评估的能力。本研究演示了集成升力传感器如何用于量化MFL传感器通过凹痕时的升力。这种技术集成允许对许多有金属损失的凹痕有信心地应用尺寸规格,从而允许对服务进行可靠的适应性评估。本文考察了几个案例研究,展示了集成的MFL和起吊技术如何在确保管道安全运行的同时减少挖掘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信