Examining Colleges of Education Science Tutors’ Practices of Differentiated Instructions: A Study of Colleges of Education in the Volta Region

David Tsitu Agbeko, K. Mensah, A. Gyampoh, S. Amoako, F. Harvey
{"title":"Examining Colleges of Education Science Tutors’ Practices of Differentiated Instructions: A Study of Colleges of Education in the Volta Region","authors":"David Tsitu Agbeko, K. Mensah, A. Gyampoh, S. Amoako, F. Harvey","doi":"10.48165/ijrse.2022.2.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to examine colleges of education science tutors’ practices of differentiated instruction in the Volta Region of Ghana. The study employed explanatory sequential design. The participants were 32 science tutors from Colleges of Education in the Volta Region of Ghana, who were purposively selected based on having direct instructional contacts with students all the time and their teaching experiences within and outside colleges. Questionnaire, Rating Scale, and Interview were used to collect data. It was found that science tutors have different knowledge on content, learning style, learner interest, learner diversity, process, product, and lesson planning. The findings also revealed that majority (80%) of science tutors who did not differentiate instruction in their classrooms have the knowledge of differentiated instruction but their failure to make use of DI was due to scarcity of time, complex nature of DI, high level of workload. The results also revealed that, majority (80%) of the science tutors did not use their assessment feedback to guide their instruction. These science tutors said marking schemes were always given to the students for self-correction. The results from classroom observation showed that these tutors do not teach to meet the diverse needs of learners. Majority of the participants still hold to traditional classroom teaching strategies based on one size-fits-all approach which proved to be ineffective. The study recommended that mentoring universities should organize workshops on the differentiated instructional for tutors and mount course in DI for student teachers.","PeriodicalId":245327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation and Special Education (IJRSE)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation and Special Education (IJRSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48165/ijrse.2022.2.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to examine colleges of education science tutors’ practices of differentiated instruction in the Volta Region of Ghana. The study employed explanatory sequential design. The participants were 32 science tutors from Colleges of Education in the Volta Region of Ghana, who were purposively selected based on having direct instructional contacts with students all the time and their teaching experiences within and outside colleges. Questionnaire, Rating Scale, and Interview were used to collect data. It was found that science tutors have different knowledge on content, learning style, learner interest, learner diversity, process, product, and lesson planning. The findings also revealed that majority (80%) of science tutors who did not differentiate instruction in their classrooms have the knowledge of differentiated instruction but their failure to make use of DI was due to scarcity of time, complex nature of DI, high level of workload. The results also revealed that, majority (80%) of the science tutors did not use their assessment feedback to guide their instruction. These science tutors said marking schemes were always given to the students for self-correction. The results from classroom observation showed that these tutors do not teach to meet the diverse needs of learners. Majority of the participants still hold to traditional classroom teaching strategies based on one size-fits-all approach which proved to be ineffective. The study recommended that mentoring universities should organize workshops on the differentiated instructional for tutors and mount course in DI for student teachers.
教育学院理科教师差异化教学实践考察——以伏尔泰地区教育学院为例
本研究旨在考察加纳沃尔塔地区教育科学学院教师的差异化教学实践。本研究采用解释序贯设计。参与者是来自加纳Volta地区教育学院的32名科学导师,他们是根据一直与学生的直接教学接触以及他们在学院内外的教学经验有目的地选择的。采用问卷调查法、评定量表法和访谈法收集数据。科学教师在内容、学习风格、学习者兴趣、学习者多样性、过程、产品和课程计划等方面存在不同的认识。调查结果还显示,大多数(80%)在课堂上没有区分教学的科学导师都知道区分教学,但他们未能利用区分教学是由于时间短缺、区分教学的复杂性和高水平的工作量。结果还显示,大多数(80%)的科学教师没有使用他们的评估反馈来指导他们的教学。这些科学导师说,他们总是给学生打分,让他们自我纠正。课堂观察的结果表明,这些教师的教学没有满足学习者的多样化需求。大多数参与者仍然坚持传统的“一刀切”的课堂教学策略,这种策略被证明是无效的。本研究建议,师徒型大学应为导师举办差异化教学研讨会,并为实习教师开设差异化教学课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信