The Discourse Framework and Dynamic Mechanism of The Coronavirus Rumors in China—Content Analysis Based on 720 Disinformation

Yuzhen Deng
{"title":"The Discourse Framework and Dynamic Mechanism of The Coronavirus Rumors in China—Content Analysis Based on 720 Disinformation","authors":"Yuzhen Deng","doi":"10.37420/cwcgc.2020.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the eve of the 2020 Spring Festival, China has experienced the largest public health security incident. This study uses content analysis to study the discourse framework and dynamic mechanism of rumors during the epidemic. This study analyzes the content, emotion and rhetoric of the epidemic rumors in the three platforms of wechat public platform \"@ Lilac Garden\", \"@ Internet Joint Rumor Refutation\" and \"Qingbo Big Data\". Since the outbreak of the epidemic, as of March 1, we have collected a total of 943 pieces of anti rumors information, and classified them into virus prevention, epidemic information, public life, sensitive information and international information. From an emotional point of view, the rumors is still negative rumors accounted for the main body, neutral as a supplement, the number of positive rumors is very small. Among them, the number of negative rumors in the epidemic information category is the largest. Rhetorically, it is characterized by authority blessing and fear appeal.","PeriodicalId":178459,"journal":{"name":"China and the World in the Context of the Globalization of COVID-19","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China and the World in the Context of the Globalization of COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37420/cwcgc.2020.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the eve of the 2020 Spring Festival, China has experienced the largest public health security incident. This study uses content analysis to study the discourse framework and dynamic mechanism of rumors during the epidemic. This study analyzes the content, emotion and rhetoric of the epidemic rumors in the three platforms of wechat public platform "@ Lilac Garden", "@ Internet Joint Rumor Refutation" and "Qingbo Big Data". Since the outbreak of the epidemic, as of March 1, we have collected a total of 943 pieces of anti rumors information, and classified them into virus prevention, epidemic information, public life, sensitive information and international information. From an emotional point of view, the rumors is still negative rumors accounted for the main body, neutral as a supplement, the number of positive rumors is very small. Among them, the number of negative rumors in the epidemic information category is the largest. Rhetorically, it is characterized by authority blessing and fear appeal.
中国冠状病毒谣言的话语框架与动力机制——基于720条虚假信息的内容分析
在2020年春节前夕,中国经历了最大的公共卫生安全事件。本研究采用内容分析法研究疫情期间谣言的话语框架和动态机制。本研究分析了微信公众平台“@丁香花园”、“@互联网联合辟谣”和“清博大数据”三个平台中流行谣言的内容、情绪和修辞。疫情发生以来,截至3月1日,我们共收集辟谣信息943条,分为病毒防范、疫情信息、公共生活、敏感信息和国际信息。从情绪上看,谣言仍以负面谣言占主体,中性谣言为辅,正面谣言数量极少。其中,疫情信息类负面谣言数量最多。在修辞学上,它具有权威祝福和恐惧诉求的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信