A comparative study of users' subjective feeling collection instruments

Letícia G. Zacano da Silva, P. D. Guimarães, Luciana Oliveira de Souza Gomes, Vânia P. A. Neris
{"title":"A comparative study of users' subjective feeling collection instruments","authors":"Letícia G. Zacano da Silva, P. D. Guimarães, Luciana Oliveira de Souza Gomes, Vânia P. A. Neris","doi":"10.1145/3424953.3426642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although interaction with computational systems influences human emotions, knowing what emotion emerges is a rather complex task. Researchers from the Human-Computer Interaction field employ several different methods to measure altered emotions and collecting data about users' subjective feeling is one of them. However, there is a lack of experimental studies that compare the different instruments used to evaluate these feelings. This paper carries out an investigation with four instruments - a set of emojis, the Self-Assessment Manikin, scroll sliders and Semantic Emotional Space - to find out which provides information about a subjective feeling that is closest to an emotion that has already been pre-classified by the literature for a given stimulus. The experiments involved 29 volunteers taking part in four experimental rounds. In each round, a volunteer watched a movie or part of a video clip and later randomly interacted with one of the instruments in a user interface. The results suggested that the scroll slider leads to a greater proximity to the pre-classified emotions.","PeriodicalId":102113,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3424953.3426642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although interaction with computational systems influences human emotions, knowing what emotion emerges is a rather complex task. Researchers from the Human-Computer Interaction field employ several different methods to measure altered emotions and collecting data about users' subjective feeling is one of them. However, there is a lack of experimental studies that compare the different instruments used to evaluate these feelings. This paper carries out an investigation with four instruments - a set of emojis, the Self-Assessment Manikin, scroll sliders and Semantic Emotional Space - to find out which provides information about a subjective feeling that is closest to an emotion that has already been pre-classified by the literature for a given stimulus. The experiments involved 29 volunteers taking part in four experimental rounds. In each round, a volunteer watched a movie or part of a video clip and later randomly interacted with one of the instruments in a user interface. The results suggested that the scroll slider leads to a greater proximity to the pre-classified emotions.
用户主观感受采集工具的比较研究
虽然与计算系统的交互会影响人类的情绪,但了解情绪的产生是一项相当复杂的任务。人机交互领域的研究人员采用了几种不同的方法来测量变化的情绪,收集用户主观感受的数据就是其中之一。然而,缺乏实验研究来比较用于评估这些感觉的不同工具。本文使用四种工具进行了调查——一组表情符号、自我评估模型、滚动条和语义情感空间——以找出哪种工具提供的信息最接近一种已经被文献预先分类的情感。29名志愿者参加了四轮实验。在每一轮中,志愿者观看一部电影或一段视频片段,然后在用户界面上随机与其中一种仪器进行互动。结果表明,滚动条使人更接近预先分类的情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信