On comparison of a conventional proportional-integral plus derivative controller versus a fuzzy proportional-integral plus derivative controller: a case study of subsystem failure

P. Sooraksa, Guanrong Chen
{"title":"On comparison of a conventional proportional-integral plus derivative controller versus a fuzzy proportional-integral plus derivative controller: a case study of subsystem failure","authors":"P. Sooraksa, Guanrong Chen","doi":"10.1109/ICIT.2002.1189891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A conventional PI+D controller is a practical structure of PID typed controllers, widely used in industry and mechatronic applications. In addition, many fuzzy control-based versions, embracing the linear structure of the conventional PI+D controller, have been designed and implemented. Although there are many reports proving a superior performance of these fuzzy versions over the conventional ones, there is still argument over the trade-off between the simplicity and the effectiveness with regard to the implementation as \"pros and cons\" for these two types of controllers. To help clarify these concerned issues, the paper presents a detailed study on comparison of conventional PI+D controller versus a fuzzy PI+D controller in the case of a subsystem failure. Simulations on an induction AC motor are carried out as part of the investigation. In case of failure in the feedforward path of the PI control subsystem, the finding shows that the conventional controller fails to perform whereas the fuzzy controller remains working very well.","PeriodicalId":344984,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 2002. IEEE ICIT '02.","volume":"77 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 2002. IEEE ICIT '02.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2002.1189891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A conventional PI+D controller is a practical structure of PID typed controllers, widely used in industry and mechatronic applications. In addition, many fuzzy control-based versions, embracing the linear structure of the conventional PI+D controller, have been designed and implemented. Although there are many reports proving a superior performance of these fuzzy versions over the conventional ones, there is still argument over the trade-off between the simplicity and the effectiveness with regard to the implementation as "pros and cons" for these two types of controllers. To help clarify these concerned issues, the paper presents a detailed study on comparison of conventional PI+D controller versus a fuzzy PI+D controller in the case of a subsystem failure. Simulations on an induction AC motor are carried out as part of the investigation. In case of failure in the feedforward path of the PI control subsystem, the finding shows that the conventional controller fails to perform whereas the fuzzy controller remains working very well.
传统比例积分加导数控制器与模糊比例积分加导数控制器的比较:以子系统故障为例
传统的PI+D控制器是一种实用的PID控制器结构,广泛应用于工业和机电应用。此外,还设计并实现了许多基于模糊控制的版本,这些版本采用了传统PI+D控制器的线性结构。尽管有许多报告证明这些模糊版本的性能优于传统版本,但关于这两种类型控制器的实现的“利弊”,简单性和有效性之间的权衡仍然存在争议。为了帮助澄清这些相关问题,本文详细研究了在子系统故障情况下,传统PI+D控制器与模糊PI+D控制器的比较。在感应交流电机上进行了仿真,作为研究的一部分。在PI控制子系统前馈路径失效的情况下,发现传统控制器无法正常工作,而模糊控制器仍能正常工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信