Clinical recovery time for Sars-Cov-2 Infection in healthcare workers with full and booster vaccination

Kenny Escobar-Segovia
{"title":"Clinical recovery time for Sars-Cov-2 Infection in healthcare workers with full and booster vaccination","authors":"Kenny Escobar-Segovia","doi":"10.29076/issn.2602-8360vol7iss12.2023pp73-78p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increase of infections at the end of 2021 and January 2022 due to the Omicron variant in Ecuador, raises doubts regarding the effectiveness of booster vaccination, which questions the protection provided by booster vaccination and how often to apply it. A sample of 419 cases is taken and compared with the personnel that have complete (58% with third dose) and incomplete (42%) immunization schedules as of December 2021 and January 2022, and the time of symptomatic recovery after SARS infection is determined afterwards. The results show no difference in the recovery time in patients within the two groups and similar symptoms were observed. It is concluded that, given the results, there is no evidence of the need for a third dose in general, but rather, it would be reasonable to focus the efforts of a second booster only in specific vulnerable populations, thus avoiding unnecessary adverse effects that are becoming more frequent, and even allowing the existing vaccines available in countries where they are really needed. ","PeriodicalId":136273,"journal":{"name":"FACSALUD-UNEMI","volume":"655 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FACSALUD-UNEMI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29076/issn.2602-8360vol7iss12.2023pp73-78p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increase of infections at the end of 2021 and January 2022 due to the Omicron variant in Ecuador, raises doubts regarding the effectiveness of booster vaccination, which questions the protection provided by booster vaccination and how often to apply it. A sample of 419 cases is taken and compared with the personnel that have complete (58% with third dose) and incomplete (42%) immunization schedules as of December 2021 and January 2022, and the time of symptomatic recovery after SARS infection is determined afterwards. The results show no difference in the recovery time in patients within the two groups and similar symptoms were observed. It is concluded that, given the results, there is no evidence of the need for a third dose in general, but rather, it would be reasonable to focus the efforts of a second booster only in specific vulnerable populations, thus avoiding unnecessary adverse effects that are becoming more frequent, and even allowing the existing vaccines available in countries where they are really needed. 
全面和加强疫苗接种后医护人员Sars-Cov-2感染的临床恢复时间
厄瓜多尔在2021年底和2022年1月由于欧米克隆变异而增加的感染,使人们对加强疫苗接种的有效性产生了怀疑,这对加强疫苗接种所提供的保护以及接种频率提出了质疑。选取419例病例,与截至2021年12月和2022年1月完成(58%接种了第三剂)和未完成(42%)免疫接种计划的人员进行比较,然后确定SARS感染后症状恢复的时间。结果显示两组患者恢复时间无差异,症状相似。结论是,鉴于这些结果,没有证据表明一般需要第三剂,相反,合理的做法是将第二剂加强剂的工作重点只放在特定的脆弱人群上,从而避免越来越频繁的不必要的不良反应,甚至允许在真正需要现有疫苗的国家获得现有疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信