Ethical Issues in the New Digital Era: The Case of Assisting Driving

J. Cahill, Katie Crowley, S. Cromie, A. Kay, M. Gormley, E. Kenny, Sonja Hermman, Ciaran Doyle, Ann Hever, Robert J. Ross
{"title":"Ethical Issues in the New Digital Era: The Case of Assisting Driving","authors":"J. Cahill, Katie Crowley, S. Cromie, A. Kay, M. Gormley, E. Kenny, Sonja Hermman, Ciaran Doyle, Ann Hever, Robert J. Ross","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.88371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobility is associated with driving a vehicle. Age-related declines in the abilities of older persons present certain obstacles to safe driving. The negative effects of driving cessation on older adults’ physical, mental, cognitive, and social functioning are well reported. Automated driving solutions represent a potential solution to promoting driver persistence and the management of fitness to drive issues in older adults. Technology innovation influences societal values and raises ethical questions. The advancement of new driving solutions raises overarching questions in relation to the values of society and how we design technology (a) to promote positive values around ageing, (b) to enhance ageing experience, (c) to protect human rights, (d) to ensure human benefit and (e) to prioritise human well-being. To this end, this chapter reviews the relevant ethical considerations in relation to assisted driving solutions. Further, it presents a new ethically aligned system concept for assisted driving. It is argued that human benefit, well-being and respect for human identity and rights are important goals for new automated driving technologies. Enabling driver persistence is an issue for all of society and not just older adult.","PeriodicalId":143303,"journal":{"name":"Security and Privacy From a Legal, Ethical, and Technical Perspective","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security and Privacy From a Legal, Ethical, and Technical Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mobility is associated with driving a vehicle. Age-related declines in the abilities of older persons present certain obstacles to safe driving. The negative effects of driving cessation on older adults’ physical, mental, cognitive, and social functioning are well reported. Automated driving solutions represent a potential solution to promoting driver persistence and the management of fitness to drive issues in older adults. Technology innovation influences societal values and raises ethical questions. The advancement of new driving solutions raises overarching questions in relation to the values of society and how we design technology (a) to promote positive values around ageing, (b) to enhance ageing experience, (c) to protect human rights, (d) to ensure human benefit and (e) to prioritise human well-being. To this end, this chapter reviews the relevant ethical considerations in relation to assisted driving solutions. Further, it presents a new ethically aligned system concept for assisted driving. It is argued that human benefit, well-being and respect for human identity and rights are important goals for new automated driving technologies. Enabling driver persistence is an issue for all of society and not just older adult.
新数字时代的伦理问题:以辅助驾驶为例
机动性与驾驶车辆有关。老年人与年龄有关的能力下降对安全驾驶构成了一定的障碍。停止驾驶对老年人身体、精神、认知和社会功能的负面影响已得到充分报道。自动驾驶解决方案代表了一种潜在的解决方案,可以促进驾驶员的坚持,并管理老年人的健康驾驶问题。技术创新影响社会价值,并引发伦理问题。新的驾驶解决方案的进步提出了与社会价值观以及我们如何设计技术相关的总体问题(a)促进有关老龄化的积极价值观,(b)增强老龄化体验,(c)保护人权,(d)确保人类利益和(e)优先考虑人类福祉。为此,本章回顾了与辅助驾驶解决方案相关的伦理考虑。此外,它提出了一个新的伦理一致的系统概念辅助驾驶。有人认为,人类的利益、福祉和对人类身份和权利的尊重是新的自动驾驶技术的重要目标。让司机坚持不懈是整个社会的问题,而不仅仅是老年人的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信