Towards a Comparative History of Political Communication , c.1000-1500

H. D. Weerdt, J. Watts
{"title":"Towards a Comparative History of Political Communication , c.1000-1500","authors":"H. D. Weerdt, J. Watts","doi":"10.1017/9789048551002.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the overlapping interest in political communication\n and mediation in recent Chinese and European historiographies. It\n explores a shared trend towards the social appropriation and reproduction\n of central (or ‘state’) authority by various kinds of intermediaries in the\n late Middle Ages, and underscores the use of a comparative historical\n inquiry in analyzing the different modalities and effects of the social\n appropriation of state authority in Chinese and European history.","PeriodicalId":162028,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication in Chinese and European History, 800-1600","volume":"225 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Communication in Chinese and European History, 800-1600","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048551002.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter discusses the overlapping interest in political communication and mediation in recent Chinese and European historiographies. It explores a shared trend towards the social appropriation and reproduction of central (or ‘state’) authority by various kinds of intermediaries in the late Middle Ages, and underscores the use of a comparative historical inquiry in analyzing the different modalities and effects of the social appropriation of state authority in Chinese and European history.
走向政治传播的比较历史,大约1000-1500年
本章讨论了近代中国和欧洲史学对政治沟通和调解的重叠兴趣。它探讨了中世纪晚期各种中介机构对中央(或“国家”)权力的社会占有和再生产的共同趋势,并强调了在分析中国和欧洲历史上国家权力的社会占有的不同模式和影响时使用比较历史调查的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信