Vulnerability of the old community Observations from Wuhan, China 

Xiaolin  Lao
{"title":"Vulnerability of the old community Observations from Wuhan, China ","authors":"Xiaolin  Lao","doi":"10.47472/trwfcczw","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the post‐COVID‐19 era, it is necessary for cities to increase their level of resilience to cope with unexpected risks. How can they improve their level of resilience? This article will stress research on the most vulnerable units in cities and further identify key vulnerability indicators of these units. The study area is in Wuhan, China, and the research object is the old community. In China, urban governance generally follows the \"City – District ‐ Street ‐ Community\" model, the \"street\" is the city's cell, and the community is the basic unit of urban functioning. Meanwhile, grassroots (community) governance is divided into a more fine‐grained pattern: \"Community ‐ Sub‐ community ‐ Community grid – Building.\" Unlike the internationally accepted term \"slum,\" the old community is a specific concept in China. It usually refers to communities with many vulnerable people living in, whose functional decline, structural dilapidation, environmental deterioration, because of the long period since its construction. So, the old community is the most vulnerable part of the community, and its level determines the upper limit of the city's resilience (Cannikin Law). First, this paper systematically reviews the development of Chinese communities after 1949. It classifies old communities into three categories: the street committee system, the danwei system, and the community‐based system. Second, three dimensions of resilience: physical environmental, social environmental, and individual consciousness dimensions, were derived by examining internationally sophisticated resilience assessment methods. Third, the paper observes old communities in Wuhan under these three dimensions, elaborating a series of vulnerability indicators and find out reasons. Besides, data were collected from participant observation, archives, interviews, newspapers, and published reports. This paper aims to provide a reference on how to fundamentally improve cities' resilience levels, namely, to start with their basic units and address the weakest parts. Emergency Planning, Social Connections, Connections Care, Disaster Risk Risk Management Reduction, Disaster Preparedness Economic Social Organized Government Services, Assessment Monitoring Risks,","PeriodicalId":254023,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 57th ISOCARP World Planning Congress","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 57th ISOCARP World Planning Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47472/trwfcczw","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the post‐COVID‐19 era, it is necessary for cities to increase their level of resilience to cope with unexpected risks. How can they improve their level of resilience? This article will stress research on the most vulnerable units in cities and further identify key vulnerability indicators of these units. The study area is in Wuhan, China, and the research object is the old community. In China, urban governance generally follows the "City – District ‐ Street ‐ Community" model, the "street" is the city's cell, and the community is the basic unit of urban functioning. Meanwhile, grassroots (community) governance is divided into a more fine‐grained pattern: "Community ‐ Sub‐ community ‐ Community grid – Building." Unlike the internationally accepted term "slum," the old community is a specific concept in China. It usually refers to communities with many vulnerable people living in, whose functional decline, structural dilapidation, environmental deterioration, because of the long period since its construction. So, the old community is the most vulnerable part of the community, and its level determines the upper limit of the city's resilience (Cannikin Law). First, this paper systematically reviews the development of Chinese communities after 1949. It classifies old communities into three categories: the street committee system, the danwei system, and the community‐based system. Second, three dimensions of resilience: physical environmental, social environmental, and individual consciousness dimensions, were derived by examining internationally sophisticated resilience assessment methods. Third, the paper observes old communities in Wuhan under these three dimensions, elaborating a series of vulnerability indicators and find out reasons. Besides, data were collected from participant observation, archives, interviews, newspapers, and published reports. This paper aims to provide a reference on how to fundamentally improve cities' resilience levels, namely, to start with their basic units and address the weakest parts. Emergency Planning, Social Connections, Connections Care, Disaster Risk Risk Management Reduction, Disaster Preparedness Economic Social Organized Government Services, Assessment Monitoring Risks,
武汉市旧社区脆弱性研究
在后COVID - 19时代,城市有必要提高抵御能力,以应对意外风险。他们如何提高自己的适应能力?本文将重点研究城市最脆弱单元,并进一步确定城市最脆弱单元的关键脆弱性指标。研究区域在中国武汉,研究对象为老社区。在中国,城市治理一般遵循“城市-区-街道-社区”的模式,“街道”是城市的细胞,社区是城市功能的基本单位。同时,基层(社区)治理被划分为更细粒度的模式:“社区-子社区-社区-社区网格-建设”。与国际上公认的“贫民窟”不同,旧社区在中国是一个特定的概念。它通常是指由于建成时间较长,功能衰退、结构破旧、环境恶化的弱势群体较多的社区。因此,旧社区是社区中最脆弱的部分,其水平决定了城市弹性的上限(cannkin Law)。首先,本文系统地回顾了1949年后中国社区的发展。将旧社区分为三种类型:街道委员会制度、单委会制度和社区为基础的制度。其次,通过对国际先进的弹性评估方法的研究,导出了弹性的物理环境、社会环境和个体意识三个维度。第三,在这三个维度下对武汉市老社区进行观察,阐述一系列脆弱性指标并找出原因。此外,通过参与观察、档案、访谈、报纸和发表的报告收集数据。本文旨在为如何从根本上提高城市的弹性水平提供参考,即从城市的基本单元入手,解决城市最薄弱的部分。应急计划,社会联系,联系关怀,灾害风险风险管理减少,备灾经济社会组织政府服务,风险评估监测,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信