Narrative Approach To Living Heritage

Nigel Walter
{"title":"Narrative Approach To Living Heritage","authors":"Nigel Walter","doi":"10.35784/ODK.2443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to sketch out a theoretical framework that addresses the particular needs of living heritage. ICCROM has been at the forefront of developing a conservation practice which addresses the concerns of living heritage such as religious and pilgrimage sites (e.g. Wijesuriya 2015; Wijesuriya, Thompson, and Court 2017), and others have considered the implications for the conservation process (e.g. Poulios 2014). However, to date there has been no attempt to develop a theoretical foundation for these practices. In place of the still-dominant understanding (at least as encountered in much Western practice) of historic buildings as primarily art-historical, this paper proposes a narrative approach that allows the site or building to remain within its cultural/religious context, including an acceptance of ongoing change. While the argument proceeds from Western sources, it invites dialogue with complementary understandings of the working of tradition from other regions of the world. \n  \nAny theoretical model for living heritage must address the central question of how living buildings endure between generations, that is, their continuity between past, present and future. Since modernity entails a commitment to a radical discontinuity with the past, such an approach must engage with the resources of premodernity to develop (or perhaps return to) a non-modern understanding of tradition as developmental and creative (Author, 2017). The principal sources used in the investigation of this proposed narrative approach include Alasdair MacIntyre’s rehabilitation of tradition, Hans-Georg Gadamer’s development of philosophical hermeneutics and Paul Ricoeur’s work on narrative and time.","PeriodicalId":273645,"journal":{"name":"Protection of Cultural Heritage","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protection of Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/ODK.2443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper attempts to sketch out a theoretical framework that addresses the particular needs of living heritage. ICCROM has been at the forefront of developing a conservation practice which addresses the concerns of living heritage such as religious and pilgrimage sites (e.g. Wijesuriya 2015; Wijesuriya, Thompson, and Court 2017), and others have considered the implications for the conservation process (e.g. Poulios 2014). However, to date there has been no attempt to develop a theoretical foundation for these practices. In place of the still-dominant understanding (at least as encountered in much Western practice) of historic buildings as primarily art-historical, this paper proposes a narrative approach that allows the site or building to remain within its cultural/religious context, including an acceptance of ongoing change. While the argument proceeds from Western sources, it invites dialogue with complementary understandings of the working of tradition from other regions of the world.   Any theoretical model for living heritage must address the central question of how living buildings endure between generations, that is, their continuity between past, present and future. Since modernity entails a commitment to a radical discontinuity with the past, such an approach must engage with the resources of premodernity to develop (or perhaps return to) a non-modern understanding of tradition as developmental and creative (Author, 2017). The principal sources used in the investigation of this proposed narrative approach include Alasdair MacIntyre’s rehabilitation of tradition, Hans-Georg Gadamer’s development of philosophical hermeneutics and Paul Ricoeur’s work on narrative and time.
活的遗产的叙事方法
本文试图勾勒出一个理论框架,以解决生活遗产的特殊需求。ICCROM一直处于发展保护实践的最前沿,该实践解决了宗教和朝圣场所等活态遗产的问题(例如Wijesuriya 2015;Wijesuriya, Thompson, and Court 2017),其他人则考虑了对保护过程的影响(例如Poulios 2014)。然而,迄今为止,还没有人试图为这些实践建立理论基础。为了取代仍然占主导地位的对历史建筑的理解(至少在许多西方实践中遇到的),本文提出了一种叙事方法,允许场地或建筑保留在其文化/宗教背景中,包括接受正在进行的变化。虽然这一论点来自西方,但它邀请人们与世界其他地区对传统运作的互补理解进行对话。任何关于生活遗产的理论模型都必须解决这样一个核心问题:生活建筑如何在几代人之间持续存在,即它们在过去、现在和未来之间的连续性。由于现代性需要承诺与过去彻底断续,这种方法必须与前现代性的资源相结合,以发展(或可能回归)对传统的非现代理解,将其视为发展和创造性的(Author, 2017)。研究这种叙事方法的主要资料来源包括阿拉斯代尔·麦金太尔对传统的恢复,汉斯-乔治·伽达默尔对哲学解释学的发展,以及保罗·里科尔对叙事和时间的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信