Dynamic Capability Seen Through a Duality-Paradox Lens: A Case of Radical Innovation at Microsoft

B. Sugarman
{"title":"Dynamic Capability Seen Through a Duality-Paradox Lens: A Case of Radical Innovation at Microsoft","authors":"B. Sugarman","doi":"10.1108/S0897-301620140000022003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article brings a new, broad conceptual framework to the quest for understanding dynamic capability in organizations (i.e.\" managing on the edge of chaos\"). This approach rests on two major pillars: (i) a duality-paradox perspective and (ii) new typologies of organizational learning (OL) and individual action/thinking. A case of radical innovation at Microsoft provides a multi-level illustration; interpreting it requires a focus on two dualistic challenges. For use in future ODC research and practical assessment the broad new conceptual framework includes: (i) collaboration as a central concept; (ii) duality-paradox as a key source of conflicts that can threaten collaboration; (iii) five types of organizational learning, (iv) four types of individual action/thinking, including paradoxical thinking, and (v) the proposition that \"golden dualities\" can be created from once-troubling duality situations (where critical collaboration was in danger) which have been transformed from the (metaphorical) \"odd (contentious) couple\" into a \"productive (collaborative) partnership\".","PeriodicalId":212698,"journal":{"name":"Change Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Change Management & Organizational Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0897-301620140000022003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article brings a new, broad conceptual framework to the quest for understanding dynamic capability in organizations (i.e." managing on the edge of chaos"). This approach rests on two major pillars: (i) a duality-paradox perspective and (ii) new typologies of organizational learning (OL) and individual action/thinking. A case of radical innovation at Microsoft provides a multi-level illustration; interpreting it requires a focus on two dualistic challenges. For use in future ODC research and practical assessment the broad new conceptual framework includes: (i) collaboration as a central concept; (ii) duality-paradox as a key source of conflicts that can threaten collaboration; (iii) five types of organizational learning, (iv) four types of individual action/thinking, including paradoxical thinking, and (v) the proposition that "golden dualities" can be created from once-troubling duality situations (where critical collaboration was in danger) which have been transformed from the (metaphorical) "odd (contentious) couple" into a "productive (collaborative) partnership".
从二元悖论的视角看动态能力:微软激进创新案例
本文为理解组织中的动态能力(即“在混乱的边缘进行管理”)提供了一个新的、广泛的概念框架。这种方法基于两个主要支柱:(i)二元悖论视角和(ii)组织学习(OL)和个人行动/思维的新类型。微软激进创新的一个案例提供了一个多层次的说明;解读它需要关注两个二元挑战。为了在未来的ODC研究和实际评估中使用,广泛的新概念框架包括:(i)作为中心概念的合作;(ii)二元悖论是威胁合作的冲突的主要来源;(iii)五种类型的组织学习,(iv)四种类型的个人行动/思维,包括悖论思维,以及(v)“黄金二元性”可以从曾经令人不安的二元性情况(关键合作处于危险之中)中创造出来的命题,这种二元性已经从(隐喻的)“古怪(有争议)的夫妻”变成了“富有成效(合作)的伙伴关系”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信