Modern Medicine and the 20th Century Decline in Mortality: Evidence on the Impact of Sulfa Drugs

S. Jayachandran, A. Lleras-Muney, Kimberly V. Smith
{"title":"Modern Medicine and the 20th Century Decline in Mortality: Evidence on the Impact of Sulfa Drugs","authors":"S. Jayachandran, A. Lleras-Muney, Kimberly V. Smith","doi":"10.3386/w15089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research suggests that medical advances played a negligible role in the large decline in mortality rates during the first half of the twentieth century. This paper, in contrast, presents evidence that sulfa drugs―the first pharmaceuticals effective at treating infectious diseases― were an important cause of U.S. mortality declines after their discovery in the 1930s. Using timeseries and difference-in-difference methods (with infectious diseases unaffected by sulfa drugs as a comparison group), we present evidence on the effects of sulfa drugs on mortality. We find that sulfa drugs led to a 25% decline in maternal mortality, a 13% decline in pneumonia and influenza mortality, and a 52% decline in scarlet fever mortality between 1937 and 1943. Sulfa drugs also widened racial disparities in mortality, suggesting that new medical technology diffuses more rapidly among whites than blacks and consistent with the hypothesis that innovation initially increases inequality across population subgroups.","PeriodicalId":277095,"journal":{"name":"MedRN: Other Infectious Diseases (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedRN: Other Infectious Diseases (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w15089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Previous research suggests that medical advances played a negligible role in the large decline in mortality rates during the first half of the twentieth century. This paper, in contrast, presents evidence that sulfa drugs―the first pharmaceuticals effective at treating infectious diseases― were an important cause of U.S. mortality declines after their discovery in the 1930s. Using timeseries and difference-in-difference methods (with infectious diseases unaffected by sulfa drugs as a comparison group), we present evidence on the effects of sulfa drugs on mortality. We find that sulfa drugs led to a 25% decline in maternal mortality, a 13% decline in pneumonia and influenza mortality, and a 52% decline in scarlet fever mortality between 1937 and 1943. Sulfa drugs also widened racial disparities in mortality, suggesting that new medical technology diffuses more rapidly among whites than blacks and consistent with the hypothesis that innovation initially increases inequality across population subgroups.
现代医学和20世纪死亡率的下降:磺胺类药物影响的证据
先前的研究表明,在20世纪上半叶死亡率的大幅下降中,医学进步所起的作用微不足道。相比之下,这篇论文提供的证据表明,磺胺类药物——第一批有效治疗传染病的药物——是20世纪30年代发现后美国死亡率下降的重要原因。使用时间序列和差中差方法(以不受磺胺类药物影响的传染病作为对照组),我们提供了磺胺类药物对死亡率影响的证据。我们发现,磺胺类药物导致1937年至1943年间孕产妇死亡率下降25%,肺炎和流感死亡率下降13%,猩红热死亡率下降52%。磺胺类药物还扩大了死亡率方面的种族差异,这表明新的医疗技术在白人中传播的速度比在黑人中传播得更快,这与创新最初会加剧人口亚群之间不平等的假设是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信