Chinese quantifier scope, concord, and Lexical Resource Semantics

Jingcheng Niu, Xinyu Kang, Pascal Hohmann, Gerlad Penn
{"title":"Chinese quantifier scope, concord, and Lexical Resource Semantics","authors":"Jingcheng Niu, Xinyu Kang, Pascal Hohmann, Gerlad Penn","doi":"10.21248/hpsg.2022.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper considers Chinese quantifier scope, an important, outstanding\narea of Chinese linguistics. In particular, there are two open questions on the\nsubject: (1) the guiding principles that determine (a) the scopal\nreadings of quantifiers and (b) the sometimes mandatory co-occurrence of the\nuniversal quantifier mei (every) and the universal\nadverb dou, and (2) the semantic functions of mei and\ndou and their connection to the co-occurrence of these words.\n\nWe reappraise three prior accounts of these subjects, reason through their\nconsequences on some exemplary data, offer a new explanation based upon\nconcord, a mechanism that is commonplace in many languages, and formulate it in\nlexical resource semantics (LRS). We use two principles adapted from\nRichter and Sailer's (2004) analysis of negative concord,\nexpanded with a new quantifier order constraint to generate a\ncoherent answer to the two aforementioned questions.","PeriodicalId":388937,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2022.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper considers Chinese quantifier scope, an important, outstanding area of Chinese linguistics. In particular, there are two open questions on the subject: (1) the guiding principles that determine (a) the scopal readings of quantifiers and (b) the sometimes mandatory co-occurrence of the universal quantifier mei (every) and the universal adverb dou, and (2) the semantic functions of mei and dou and their connection to the co-occurrence of these words. We reappraise three prior accounts of these subjects, reason through their consequences on some exemplary data, offer a new explanation based upon concord, a mechanism that is commonplace in many languages, and formulate it in lexical resource semantics (LRS). We use two principles adapted from Richter and Sailer's (2004) analysis of negative concord, expanded with a new quantifier order constraint to generate a coherent answer to the two aforementioned questions.
汉语量词范围、一致性与词汇资源语义
汉语量词范围是汉语语言学的一个重要的、突出的研究领域。特别是,关于这一主题,有两个悬而未决的问题:(1)决定(a)量词的范围解读的指导原则;(b)普遍量词“每”和普遍副词“每”有时强制共现的指导原则;(2)“每”和“都”的语义功能及其与这两个词共现的关系。我们重新评估了这些主题的三个先前的帐户,通过它们对一些示例数据的结果进行推理,基于在许多语言中常见的机制concord提供了一个新的解释,并将其表述为词法资源语义(LRS)。我们使用了两个原则,改编自mrichter和Sailer(2004)对否定和谐的分析,并扩展了一个新的量词顺序约束,以生成上述两个问题的连贯答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信