A comparison between moire interferometry and strain gages for effective CTE measurement in electronic packages

T. Ratanawilai, B. Hunter, G. Subbarayan, D. Rose
{"title":"A comparison between moire interferometry and strain gages for effective CTE measurement in electronic packages","authors":"T. Ratanawilai, B. Hunter, G. Subbarayan, D. Rose","doi":"10.1109/ITHERM.2000.866198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-sensitivity laser moire interferometry technique has proven to be invaluable in characterizing electronic packages. It is often contrasted to the classical strain gage technique as a more powerful, whole-field alternative for the characterization of electronic packages. In this paper, we present a systematic comparison of the accuracy of thermal strains measured using the moire technique to that obtained using strain gages. The effective thermal strains in approximately twenty printed circuit board specimens were measured using the two techniques. The results of the two techniques showed good overall correlation, but differed from each other by as much as 2.73 PPM. The possible sources of error in each technique are identified and discussed. Of practical significance, the measured effective coefficient of thermal expansion varied in wide range by as much as 5 PPM about the commonly used value of 17 PPM. This has been shown in a related study as causing a significant reliability impact for a plastic ball grid array package assembly.","PeriodicalId":201262,"journal":{"name":"ITHERM 2000. The Seventh Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (Cat. No.00CH37069)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ITHERM 2000. The Seventh Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (Cat. No.00CH37069)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHERM.2000.866198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

High-sensitivity laser moire interferometry technique has proven to be invaluable in characterizing electronic packages. It is often contrasted to the classical strain gage technique as a more powerful, whole-field alternative for the characterization of electronic packages. In this paper, we present a systematic comparison of the accuracy of thermal strains measured using the moire technique to that obtained using strain gages. The effective thermal strains in approximately twenty printed circuit board specimens were measured using the two techniques. The results of the two techniques showed good overall correlation, but differed from each other by as much as 2.73 PPM. The possible sources of error in each technique are identified and discussed. Of practical significance, the measured effective coefficient of thermal expansion varied in wide range by as much as 5 PPM about the commonly used value of 17 PPM. This has been shown in a related study as causing a significant reliability impact for a plastic ball grid array package assembly.
云纹干涉法与应变仪在电子封装中有效CTE测量的比较
高灵敏度激光云纹干涉测量技术已被证明在电子封装的表征中是非常宝贵的。它经常与经典应变计技术形成对比,作为电子封装表征的更强大,全领域的替代方案。在本文中,我们提出了一个系统的比较,使用云纹技术测量的热应变的精度,获得了使用应变片。用这两种方法测量了近20个印刷电路板试样的有效热应变。这两种技术的结果显示出良好的总体相关性,但彼此之间的差异高达2.73 PPM。对每种技术中可能的误差来源进行了识别和讨论。具有实际意义的是,测量到的有效热膨胀系数在广泛的范围内变化高达5ppm,约为常用值17ppm。在一项相关研究中表明,这对塑料球栅阵列封装组件的可靠性造成了重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信