Common-Mode Voltage Reduction in a VSI Inverter Applying Sequential Predictive Control

D. Murillo-Yarce, M. Rivera, C. Restrepo, Javier A. Muñoz, C. Baier, R. Rodríguez, P. Wheeler, P. Zanchetta, G. Mirzaeva
{"title":"Common-Mode Voltage Reduction in a VSI Inverter Applying Sequential Predictive Control","authors":"D. Murillo-Yarce, M. Rivera, C. Restrepo, Javier A. Muñoz, C. Baier, R. Rodríguez, P. Wheeler, P. Zanchetta, G. Mirzaeva","doi":"10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the classical predictive control (CPC) implementation a cost function designed in terms of the control objectives and constants known as weighting factors must be minimized. Weighting factors are usually obtained by trial and error since there is no methodology to find the best factors, which also improve the controller performance. One possible solution is sequential predictive control (SPC) that proposes to eliminate weighting factors by sequential evaluation of simple cost functions. The contribution of this work is to analyze in detail the SPC performance and compare the results with a classic predictive current controller, in a VSI converter feeding an RL load where common-mode voltage is also reduced. Matlab/Simulink simulation results show that the SPC technique is able to reduce the common-mode voltage by half and still obtaining a balanced current system with an allowable THD, which is not feasible for the CPC technique. These findings demonstrate that SPC can improve results obtained with CPC without using weighting factors.","PeriodicalId":328922,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the classical predictive control (CPC) implementation a cost function designed in terms of the control objectives and constants known as weighting factors must be minimized. Weighting factors are usually obtained by trial and error since there is no methodology to find the best factors, which also improve the controller performance. One possible solution is sequential predictive control (SPC) that proposes to eliminate weighting factors by sequential evaluation of simple cost functions. The contribution of this work is to analyze in detail the SPC performance and compare the results with a classic predictive current controller, in a VSI converter feeding an RL load where common-mode voltage is also reduced. Matlab/Simulink simulation results show that the SPC technique is able to reduce the common-mode voltage by half and still obtaining a balanced current system with an allowable THD, which is not feasible for the CPC technique. These findings demonstrate that SPC can improve results obtained with CPC without using weighting factors.
应用序贯预测控制的VSI逆变器共模电压降低
在经典的预测控制(CPC)实现中,根据控制目标和称为权重因子的常数设计的成本函数必须最小化。加权因子通常是通过试错法获得的,因为没有找到最佳因子的方法,这也提高了控制器的性能。一种可能的解决方案是顺序预测控制(SPC),它建议通过简单成本函数的顺序评估来消除权重因素。这项工作的贡献是详细分析SPC性能,并将结果与经典的预测电流控制器进行比较,在VSI转换器中馈送RL负载,其中共模电压也降低了。Matlab/Simulink仿真结果表明,SPC技术能够将共模电压降低一半,并且仍然获得具有允许THD的平衡电流系统,这对于CPC技术来说是不可行的。这些发现表明SPC可以在不使用加权因子的情况下改善CPC获得的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信