The impact of lecture chunking format on university student vigilance: Implications for classroom pedagogy

Andrew Harris, S. Buglass, G. Gous
{"title":"The impact of lecture chunking format on university student vigilance: Implications for classroom pedagogy","authors":"Andrew Harris, S. Buglass, G. Gous","doi":"10.33902/jpsp.2021272429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consistent with capacity theories of attention, attention can be sustained to the extent that spare mental \nresources remain available. The traditional lecture in higher education has received criticism for being too \nlong to hold a student’s attention. This is based on several author’s claims that there is a measurable \ndecrement in student attention after approximately 10-15 minutes of sustained content delivery. The \npresent research aimed to investigate if providing small, separate units of an asynchronous lecture is able \nto enhance motivation for task engagement through perceived achievability of the learning outcomes, and \nconsequently, enhance sustained attention amongst postgraduate university students. Utilising a quasiexperimental design, 51 postgraduate psychology students were recruited by opportunistic sampling from \na cognitive psychology lecture on an MSc Psychology course, and given the option to watch either a long, \nsingle-video version of a lecture, or the same lecture delivered as smaller separate video chunks. Key \nfindings indicate that presenting the material as smaller separate video units increased the perceived \nachievability of the learning outcomes and reduced the number of attention lapses experienced, but not \nthe duration of those lapses, all measured via self-report single-item measures. The shorter separate videos \ncondition also saw greater levels of break taking compliance. Looking at the sample as a whole using a \nhierarchical regression analysis, whilst controlling for student mind wandering tendencies as measured by \nthe Mind Excessively Wandering Scale (MEWS), taking breaks was a significant negative predictor of \nattention lapses. Taken together, this suggests taking breaks is an integral part of sustained attention, and \nthat chunking lectures into separate video units increases break taking compliance. Therefore, when \ndesigning online asynchronous learning material, lecturers should consider the value of chunking learning \nmaterial for its potential direct and indirect effect on sustained attention.","PeriodicalId":365567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.2021272429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Consistent with capacity theories of attention, attention can be sustained to the extent that spare mental resources remain available. The traditional lecture in higher education has received criticism for being too long to hold a student’s attention. This is based on several author’s claims that there is a measurable decrement in student attention after approximately 10-15 minutes of sustained content delivery. The present research aimed to investigate if providing small, separate units of an asynchronous lecture is able to enhance motivation for task engagement through perceived achievability of the learning outcomes, and consequently, enhance sustained attention amongst postgraduate university students. Utilising a quasiexperimental design, 51 postgraduate psychology students were recruited by opportunistic sampling from a cognitive psychology lecture on an MSc Psychology course, and given the option to watch either a long, single-video version of a lecture, or the same lecture delivered as smaller separate video chunks. Key findings indicate that presenting the material as smaller separate video units increased the perceived achievability of the learning outcomes and reduced the number of attention lapses experienced, but not the duration of those lapses, all measured via self-report single-item measures. The shorter separate videos condition also saw greater levels of break taking compliance. Looking at the sample as a whole using a hierarchical regression analysis, whilst controlling for student mind wandering tendencies as measured by the Mind Excessively Wandering Scale (MEWS), taking breaks was a significant negative predictor of attention lapses. Taken together, this suggests taking breaks is an integral part of sustained attention, and that chunking lectures into separate video units increases break taking compliance. Therefore, when designing online asynchronous learning material, lecturers should consider the value of chunking learning material for its potential direct and indirect effect on sustained attention.
课堂分块形式对大学生警觉性的影响:对课堂教学法的启示
与注意力的能力理论一致,注意力可以持续到空闲的精神资源仍然可用的程度。高等教育中的传统讲座因太长而无法吸引学生的注意力而受到批评。这是基于几位作者的说法,即在大约10-15分钟的持续内容传递后,学生的注意力会明显下降。本研究旨在调查提供小的、独立的异步讲座单元是否能够通过学习成果的可实现性来增强任务参与的动机,从而增强研究生的持续注意力。利用准实验设计,通过机会抽样从心理学硕士课程的认知心理学讲座中招募了51名心理学研究生,并让他们选择观看一个长视频版本的讲座,或者以较小的独立视频块的形式播放相同的讲座。主要研究结果表明,以较小的独立视频单元呈现材料增加了学习成果的可实现性,减少了经历的注意力缺失次数,但没有减少这些缺失的持续时间,所有这些都是通过自我报告的单项测量来测量的。在较短的单独视频条件下,休息时间的依从性也更高。使用层次回归分析将样本作为一个整体来看,同时控制学生的走神倾向(通过思维过度走神量表(MEWS)测量),休息是注意力缺失的显著负向预测因子。综上所述,这表明休息是持续注意力的一个组成部分,将讲座分成单独的视频单元可以提高休息的依从性。因此,在设计在线异步学习材料时,讲师应该考虑分块学习材料的价值,因为它可能对持续注意力产生直接和间接的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信