INSTITUTION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS FOR ECONOMIC OFFENCES

Elizaveta V. Mezhenina
{"title":"INSTITUTION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS FOR ECONOMIC OFFENCES","authors":"Elizaveta V. Mezhenina","doi":"10.5922/sikbfu-2023-2-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, provisions of the law about an institution of criminal proceedings in the economic sphere are controversial. The order of criminal prosecution of such crimes also is not defined clearly. The purpose of the research is to develop the optimal scenario for initiating these criminal cases and determining the most appropriate procedure for their investigation. This study relied on the methods of comparative studies, analysis and synthesis. Using the method of comparative studies, the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Fe­deration and the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on the initiation of criminal cases in the economic sphere were compared. A graphic comparison was drawn between the content of part 3 of article 20 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and Chapter 23 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The research proposed to change the text of the conditions under which the private-public procedure for the criminal prosecution of crimes in the economic sphere is applied, shifting the focus from the fact of causing harm to the direction of the act itself (Part 3, Article 20, Article 23 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation). In addition, it is proposed to include the composition of Chapter 23 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in the list of cases of private-public pro­se­cution to develop a single clear procedure for initiating these cases.","PeriodicalId":104739,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Series Humanities and social science","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Series Humanities and social science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5922/sikbfu-2023-2-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At present, provisions of the law about an institution of criminal proceedings in the economic sphere are controversial. The order of criminal prosecution of such crimes also is not defined clearly. The purpose of the research is to develop the optimal scenario for initiating these criminal cases and determining the most appropriate procedure for their investigation. This study relied on the methods of comparative studies, analysis and synthesis. Using the method of comparative studies, the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Fe­deration and the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on the initiation of criminal cases in the economic sphere were compared. A graphic comparison was drawn between the content of part 3 of article 20 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and Chapter 23 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The research proposed to change the text of the conditions under which the private-public procedure for the criminal prosecution of crimes in the economic sphere is applied, shifting the focus from the fact of causing harm to the direction of the act itself (Part 3, Article 20, Article 23 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation). In addition, it is proposed to include the composition of Chapter 23 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in the list of cases of private-public pro­se­cution to develop a single clear procedure for initiating these cases.
经济犯罪的刑事诉讼制度
目前,法律中关于经济领域刑事诉讼制度的规定存在争议。对这类罪行的刑事起诉顺序也没有明确规定。本研究的目的是制定启动这些刑事案件的最佳方案,并确定最适当的调查程序。本研究采用了比较研究法、分析研究法和综合研究法。采用比较研究的方法,对《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》和《俄罗斯联邦刑法》关于经济领域刑事案件提起的规范进行了比较。有人将《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》第20条第3部分的内容与《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第23章的内容作了生动的比较。该研究建议改变适用经济领域犯罪的公私诉讼程序的条件,将重点从造成损害的事实转移到行为本身的方向(俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法第20条第3部分、第23条)。此外,还建议将《俄罗斯联邦刑法典》第23章的构成列入公私支持死刑的案件清单,以便为提起这些案件制定一个单一的明确程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信