Methodology for Justification of Aviation Safety Investments

A. Lališ, V. Červená, Slobodan Stojić, Jakub Kraus
{"title":"Methodology for Justification of Aviation Safety Investments","authors":"A. Lališ, V. Červená, Slobodan Stojić, Jakub Kraus","doi":"10.1109/NTAD.2018.8551627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investment into safety is often seen as cost with little benefit; an obligation to meet standards rather than effort to truly improve on safety. Aviation industry of today already achieved excellent safety record and so it is hard to justify such investment in apparently resilient system. This study works with the assumption that safety and overall efficiency of operations are dependent. It analyzes data from safety occurrences in the aviation industry and provides mapping to relevant costs, both considering the remedy and possible prevention. It further provides base methodology for evaluation of current safety investments in the industry. In conclusion, the significant difference between costs related to remedy and prevention is used to justify trial of new technologies and measures to further improve on safety.","PeriodicalId":425929,"journal":{"name":"2018 XIII International Scientific Conference - New Trends in Aviation Development (NTAD)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 XIII International Scientific Conference - New Trends in Aviation Development (NTAD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NTAD.2018.8551627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investment into safety is often seen as cost with little benefit; an obligation to meet standards rather than effort to truly improve on safety. Aviation industry of today already achieved excellent safety record and so it is hard to justify such investment in apparently resilient system. This study works with the assumption that safety and overall efficiency of operations are dependent. It analyzes data from safety occurrences in the aviation industry and provides mapping to relevant costs, both considering the remedy and possible prevention. It further provides base methodology for evaluation of current safety investments in the industry. In conclusion, the significant difference between costs related to remedy and prevention is used to justify trial of new technologies and measures to further improve on safety.
航空安全投资的论证方法
在安全方面的投资通常被视为成本低、收益少;满足标准的义务,而不是真正提高安全的努力。今天的航空业已经取得了良好的安全记录,因此很难证明在明显有弹性的系统上进行这种投资是合理的。本研究的假设是,安全性和整体操作效率是相互依赖的。它分析了航空业安全事件的数据,并提供了相关成本的地图,既考虑了补救措施,也考虑了可能的预防措施。它进一步提供了评估当前行业安全投资的基本方法。总之,与补救和预防有关的费用之间的显著差异被用来证明试验新技术和进一步改进安全的措施是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信